Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-06
Type Ap Civil Appeal Circuit
Docket 16 entries
Disposition disposed

Parties

Plaintiff Roberson, Danny|Hagedorn, Anessa|Ilbig, Fred L|Puszkar, Jane
Defendant Homolak, Rachel|Grace Church Stl|Hagedorn, Vanessa|Puszkar, Jane|Barrett, Chris

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. OA Filed in Circuit Court
  2. ases Consol Under this Case Ed113921 is Lead case ED113938 is trailer case
  3. n Courts Own Motion ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION, Appeal Nos. ED113921 and ED13938 are consolidated. All future filings are to be filed in Appeal No. ED113921. Plaintiff shall file the first brief. All other briefs shall be filed in accordance with Rule 84.04 (i).
  5. lerk Remark Copy of Court Order Issued October 22, 2025 mailed to pro se parties
  6. ourt Order Issued Respondent Barrett has moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, arguing the absence of a final, appealable judgment. Appellant did not file suggestions in opposition. Respondent argues the order on appeal has not been denominated a judgment as required by Rule 74.01(a). In addition, he contends there is no final, appealable judgment, because claims remain pending in the underlying cause. We will address Respondent's motion after Appellant submits her legal file. The record on appeal remains due January 1, 2026.
  8. ntry of Appearance Filed Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: MARY ANNE LINDSEY On Behalf Of: GRACE CHURCH STL
  9. edacted Info Flng Sheet Filed Redaction Form for Exhibit 2; Exhibit 2 Unredacted; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service Filed By: JOHN M REEVES Associated Entries: 10/09/2025 - Motion for Dismissal +
  10. otion for Dismissal Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JOHN M REEVES Associated Entries: 10/09/2025 - Redacted Info Flng Sheet Filed +
  11. ntry of Appearance Filed Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: JOHN M REEVES On Behalf Of: CHRIS BARRETT
  12. lerk Remark Acknowledgement letter mailed to Cheryl Crowder. Acknowledgement letter, Pro Se Letter, & Redaction Requirements mailed to Vanessa Hagedorn. Acknowledgement letter, Pro Se Letter, & Redaction Requirements mailed to Jane Puszkar.
  13. lerk Remark Letter to Counsel RE: Remote Public Access.
  14. cknowledgement Letter Sent
  15. OA Filed in Appellate Court
  16. iling Fee Paid

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more