Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-08
Type Appeal In Certain Administrative Proceedings
Docket 34 entries
Disposition appeal is dismissed

Docket Entries

  1. ocument Transmitted
  2. ocument Not Corrected Pursuant to Notice of Defect Issued Clerk Comments: Brief and Appendix - Appellant Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: S, J Date Sent: 03/10/2025
  3. otion to Stay Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 02/01/2025 Attorney: S, J Party: S, J File Stamp: 02/11/2025
  4. otice of Judicial Bias and Intent to Seek Federal Review- Appellant Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 02/01/2025 Attorney: S, J File Stamp: 02/01/2025
  5. orrected Entry File Stamp for Notice of Judicial Bias should indicate 02/11/2025.
  6. otice of Judicial Bias and Intent to Seek Federal Review- Appellant Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 02/01/2025 Attorney: S, J Party: S, J File Stamp: 02/11/2025
  7. rder Dismissing Appeal with Prejudice order denying appellant's motion to stay and notice of judicial bias Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. The Clerk of this Court is directed to file, as of the date of this order, Appellant's Motion to Stay Dismissal Based on Economic Hardship and Due Process Violations and Notice of Judicial Bias and Intent to Seek Federal Review received on February 1, 2025. 2. Appellant's Motion to Stay Dismissal Based on Economic Hardship and Due Process Violations and Notice of Judicial Bias and Intent to Seek Federal Review are both denied. 3. Because Appellant has failed to pay the filing fee, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 4. The Clerk of this Court is directed to send this order to the parties. 5. The Review Board is directed to file this order under Cause Numbers 24-R-2846 and 24-R-2848. Kenworthy, Felix, JJ., Najam, Sr.J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: S, J File Stamp: 02/11/2025
  8. ocument Transmitted
  9. eceived Document Receive Date: 02/01/2025 Motion to Stay and Notice of Judicial Bias-Appellant **Filing fee not paid** PostmarkDate: 02/01/2025
  10. otion to Reinstate Appeal Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/29/2025 Attorney: S, J Party: S, J File Stamp: 01/31/2025
  11. otion to Clarify Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/29/2025 Attorney: S, J Party: S, J File Stamp: 01/31/2025
  12. ocument Filed Motion for Sanctions- Appellant Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/29/2025 Attorney: S, J Party: S, J File Stamp: 01/31/2025
  13. rder Issued order denying motion to reinstate appeal Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Because the Court has already denied Appellant's request to proceed in forma pauperis, Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed in 25A-EX-67 is denied. 2. The Clerk is directed to file Appellant's Motion to Reinstate Case No. 25A-EX-64 as an Independent Appeal, Motion to Clarify Case Reclassification, and Motion for Sanctions Against the Indiana Department of Workforce Development for Bad Faith Litigation that were filed in Cause Numbers 25A-EX-64 and 25A-EX-67. 3. Appellant's Motions to Reinstate Case No. 25A-EX-64 are denied. 4. Appellant's Motions to Clarify Case Reclassification are denied. 5. Appellant's Motions for Sanctions Against the Indiana Department of Workforce Development for Bad Faith Litigation are denied. 6. Pursuant to the Court's January 22, 2025 order, Appellant remains obligated to pay the filing fee on or before February 3, 2025. 7. Failure by Appellant to comply with this order and the Court's January 22, 2025 order may result in the dismissal of Appellant's appeal in Cause Number 25A-EX-67. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: S, J File Stamp: 01/31/2025
  14. ocument Transmitted
  15. otion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/29/2025 Attorney: S, J File Stamp: 01/29/2025
  16. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/29/2025 Cover letter- Appellant **Filling fee not paid** PostmarkDate: 01/29/2025
  17. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/29/2025 Affidavit of Financial Emotional and Psychological Harm-Appellant **Filing fee not paid; lacks service to opposing party's counsel who has appeared** PostmarkDate: 01/29/2025
  18. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/29/2025 Supplemental Brief Addressing Contradictions- Appellant**Filing fee not paid; lacks service to opposing party's counsel who has appeared** PostmarkDate: 01/29/2025
  19. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/29/2025 Motion to Reinstate -Appellant**Filing fee not paid;Certificate of service does not appear to serve opposing party's counsel by name; document is incorrectly paginated.** PostmarkDate: 01/29/2025
  20. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/29/2025 Motion to Clarify Reclassification- Appellant **Filing fee not paid; certificate of service lacks service to opposing party's counsel who has appeared; incorrectly paginated** PostmarkDate: 01/29/2025
  21. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/29/2025 Motion for Sanctions- Appellant **Filing fee not paid; incorrectly paginated; lacks service to opposing party's counsel who has appeared** PostmarkDate: 01/29/2025
  22. otice of Defect Issued Brief and Appendix- Appellant Party: S, J Serve: Parks, Jay Issue Date: 01/28/2025
  23. ocument Transmitted
  24. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/21/2025 Brief and Appendix-Appellant ** Filing fee has not been paid; Brief was tendered with attachments not permitted and Appendix is not formatted correctly; lacks verification of accuracy and certificate of service; Appendix also appears to lack separate volume for table of contents; Brief does not indicate service to opposing party's counsel who has appeared** PostmarkDate: 01/21/2025
  25. rder Issued order denying pauper status Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. All of Appellant's motions to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. 2. Appellant's appeals in Cause Numbers 25A-EX-64, 25A-EX-65, and 25A-EX-66 are dismissed with prejudice due to Appellant's lack of standing. 3. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 38, the Court consolidates Cause Number 25A-EX-68 under Cause Number 25A-EX-67. 4. All further filings are to be made under Cause Number 25A-EX-67. 5. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee. See Ind. Appellate Rule 9(E). 6. Failure by Appellant to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. 7. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send this order to the parties. 8. The Review Board is directed to file this order under Cause Numbers 24- R-2843, 24-R-2844, 24-R-2845, 24-R-2846, and 24-R-2848 Kenworthy, Felix, JJ., Najam, Sr.J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: S, J File Stamp: 01/22/2025
  26. ote Per the order issued on 01/22/25, this case has been consolidated with 25A-EX-68. All filings from 25A-EX-68 have been transferred to this cause number. All future filings for lower cause numbers 24-R-2846, and 24-R-2848 should be filed under this cause number.
  27. ocument Transmitted
  28. ppearance (Jay R. S. Parks) Certificate of Service-Mailed 01/14/25 Attorney: Parks, Jay Party: Review Board File Stamp: 01/14/2025
  29. otice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Requested Certificate of Service-Mailed 01/14/25 File Stamp: 01/14/2025
  30. otice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/07/25 (as stated) Attorney: S, J Party: S, J File Stamp: 01/08/2025
  31. OA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 01/10/2025
  32. otion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/07/25 (as stated) Attorney: S, J File Stamp: 01/08/2025
  33. otice Regarding Case Creation Party: S, J Notice Sent: 01/10/2025
  34. ocument Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more