Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-14
Status ACTIVE
Type Crim Appeal Circuit To District
Docket 7 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Butler, Earl Glen
Defendant State Of Florida ,
Photo of Hon. Ward David Vincent

Judge

Hon. Ward David Vincent

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE-STYLED CASE HAS FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEEKING TO COMPEL RULING ON A MOTION FOR REHEARING, FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT IN CASE NUMBER 2012-CF-00971 ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 11,2025. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PLEADING HAS BEEN RULED ON AND FOR SOME REASON THE ORDER HAS NOT REACHED PETITIONER. IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE THAT THE PLEADING IS SCHEDULED FOR A DECISION OR SOME OTHER IN THE NEAR FUTURE. ( 6D2025-2538 )
  2. DescriptionProsecutor: JAMES UTHMEIER Assigned
  3. DescriptionJudge: WARD , DAVID VINCENT Assigned
  4. DescriptionAssessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00
  5. DescriptionCase 282025AP000078APAXMX Filed with Clerk on 10/14/2025
  6. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SIXTH DISTRICT, ISSUES THIS CERTIFICATE OF INDIGENCY IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 57.081 OR 57.085, FL STATUTES. THE FILING FEE FOR THIS CASE ( 6D2025-2538 )
  7. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: WITHIN FORTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PETITIONER SHALL EITHER PAY TO THE CLERK OF THE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THE $300.00 FILING FEE REQUIRED BY SECTION 35.22, FL STAUTES, OR FILE IN THIS COURT A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY ( 6D2025-2538 )

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.