Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-09-25
Status ACTIVE
Type Civil Appl To Dca/supreme
Docket 39 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Klocko, Richard
Defendant Przychocki, Mary Elizabeth | Underwood, Sharon Louise | Mid State Ranch Inc | Watson, John C Iii
Photo of Hon. Estrada Peter

Judge

Hon. Estrada Peter

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 1/3/2026 updated with compliance action of
  2. DescriptionCompliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE updated due date to 1/3/2026
  3. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 12/20/2025 updated with compliance action of
  4. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 12/20/2025 updated with compliance action of
  5. DescriptionCompliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX updated due date to 12/20/2025
  6. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE INSTANT APPEAL IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION. APPEAL PREPARATION AND RECORD SUBMISSION SHALL COMMENCE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER
  7. DescriptionState Attorney Case Number modified: GC21-410
  8. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: PURSUANT TO THIS COURT'S ORDER ISSUED OCTOBER 15, 2025, ALL PARTIES WERE REQUIRED TO FILE MEDIATION FORMS WITH THIS COURT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THAT ORDER. AT THIS TIME, APPELLANT'S FORMS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. WITHIN 5 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, UPLOAD THE REQUIRED FORMS VIA THE STATEWIDE FLORIDA COURTS E-FILING PORTAL SO THAT THIS CASE MAY TIMELY PROCEED. PLEASE READ.
  9. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 11/15/2025 updated with compliance action of
  10. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 11/15/2025 updated with compliance action of
  11. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THIS CASE IS BEING REVIEWED BY THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR APPELLATE MEDIATION. THE TIME FOR REPARING THE RECORD AND FILING BRIEFS WILL NOT BEGIN TO RUN UNTIL AN ORDER IS ISSUED THAT THIS CASE WILL NOT PROCEED TO MEDIATION OR, IF MEDIATION IS ORDERED, UNITL THE MEDIATION PROCESS IS COMPLETE. PLEASE READ.
  12. NOTICE OF CASE UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR MEDIATION
  13. Agency Case Number modified: 6D 25-2410
  14. CIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 11/25/2025 updated with compliance action of
  15. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 11/15/2025 updated with compliance action of
  16. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 11/21/2025 updated with compliance action of
  17. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 11/21/2025 updated with compliance action of
  18. CIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 12/3/2025 updated with compliance action of
  19. CIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 12/3/2025 updated with compliance action of
  20. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 11/10/2025 updated with compliance action of
  21. Compliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX updated due date to 11/21/2025
  22. Compliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE updated due date to 12/3/2025
  23. Compliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX updated due date to 11/10/2025
  24. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THIS CASE APPEARS TO SEEK REVIEW OF A FINAL ORDER PROCEED UNDER FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.110. WITHIN SIXTY DAYS FROM THE DATE THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS FILED IN THE LOWER TRIBUNAL SHALL TRANSMIT THE RECORD ON APPEAL TO THIS COURT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FILE A NOTICE OF INABILITY TO DO SO, SPECIFYING THE REASON. PLEASE READ.
  25. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: WITHIN FORTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, APPELLANT SHALL EITHER PAY TO THE CLERK OF THE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THE 300.00 FILING FEE REQUIRED BY SECTION 35.22, FLORIDA STATUES, OR FILE IN THIS COURT A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL'S ORDER OF INSOVENCY FOR APPELLATE PURPOSES AS DISCRIBED UNDER FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.430. PLEASE READ.
  26. ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM DISTRICT COURT- THE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL HAS RECEIVED A CASE INITIATION DOCUMENT REFLECTING A FILING DATE OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2025. PLEASE READ.
  27. State Attorney Case Number modified: CA2021-410
  28. Appellant Attorney: VICTOR R SMITH Assigned to FACC.CLERICUS.Identity.NamesBAO
  29. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
  30. Judge: ESTRADA , PETER FRANK Assigned
  31. CIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 11/26/2025 updated with compliance action of
  32. Compliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE has been created with due date of 11/26/2025
  33. Compliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX has been created with due date of 11/16/2025
  34. Compliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE updated due date to 11/25/2025
  35. Compliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX updated due date to 11/15/2025
  36. Compliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE updated due date to 11/25/2025
  37. Compliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX updated due date to 11/15/2025
  38. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  39. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.