Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-27
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 37 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Pnc Bank, National Association
Defendant Annette C Wilder
Photo of Hon. NANCY MARGARET RUSSO

Judge

Hon. NANCY MARGARET RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST, SERVICE REQUEST NOTE: SERVICE REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER CANNOT BE COMPLETED DUE TO COURT LOCAL RULES. PLEASE REFER TO JUDGE RUSSO'S ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS ON THE COMMON PLEAS COURT WEBSITE.
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57351083) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ANNETTE C WILDER 1672 S TAYLOR RD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  3. SUPP JE ISSUED. OSJ. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57351082) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ROBERT GERALD WILLIAMS [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57351081) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES P MCGOWAN [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(57351080) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JAMES P MCGOWAN [email protected]
  7. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING 06/24/2025. MOTION FOR DEFAULT UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. FINAL. THIS COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION OVER ALL POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. SUPP JE TO FOLLOW. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. NOTICE FILED BY P1 PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY ROBERT GERALD WILLIAMS 0099073 NOTICE OF FILING ADDITIONAL DOCS
  9. DEFENDANT FAILED TO SUBMIT ANSWER TIMELY. CMC SCHEDULED FOR 06/24/2025 IS CANCELLED. DEFAULT HEARING TO PROCEED ON THAT DATE AND TIME. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 06/24/2025 AT 01:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
  11. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY ROBERT GERALD WILLIAMS 0099073 DEFAULT LETTER
  12. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY ROBERT GERALD WILLIAMS 0099073 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY
  13. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  14. DEFENDANT HAS BEEN SERVED. ANSWER DUE BY 4PM ON 6/6/25. PT/CMC RESET TO 6/24/25 AT 1PM. IN THE EVENT THE DEFENDANT FAILS TO TIMELY ANSWER, MOTION FOR DEFAULT DUE BY 4PM ON 6/9/25 AND PT/CMC WILL BE CONVERTED TO DEFAULT HEARING. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO TIMELY FILE MOTION/PERSONALLY APPEAR/NOTIFY DEFENDANT WILL RESULT IN DWOP. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/24/2025 AT 01:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  16. CMC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 05/20/2025 AT 02:00 PM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 06/24/2025 AT 01:00 PM (Notice Sent).
  17. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 05/20/2025 AT 02:00 PM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: NANCY MARGARET RUSSO (326) REASON: UNKNOWN (notice sent).
  18. 56594765 ON 04/22/2025 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED WILDER/ANNETTE/C BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  19. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 05/20/2025 AT 02:00 PM THIS CASE IS SET FOR A PRETRIAL/CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT. FAILURE OF ANY PARTY'S COUNSEL OR PRO SE PARTY TO APPEAR AT ANY SCHEDULED EVENT DURING THE PENDENCY OF THIS CASE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, THE APPROPRIATE MOTION MUST BE FILED NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT, AND THE COURT PROVIDED WITH A COURTESY COPY ON THE DATE OF FILING. DO NOT CALL THE COURT TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO REQUESTS NOT MADE IN WRITING, DOCKETED AND WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME ABOVE, ABSENT AN EMERGENCY. THE COURT REQUIRES A COURTESY COPY OF ALL PLEADINGS IN EXCESS OF 5 PAGES, TO BE MAILED OR HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. E-FILING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COURTESY COPY. PLEADINGS OF 5 PAGES OR LESS THAT ARE E-FILED DO NOT NEED TO BE DELIVERED TO THE COURT. PARTIES WISHING TO PERFECT SERVICE BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER IN ANY GIVEN CASE MUST FIRST FILE A SEPARATE MOTION TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER DIRECTLY WITH JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO BEFORE ATTEMPTING SERVICE BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER MAY RESULT IN THE COURT STRIKING SUCH SERVICE ATTEMPTS. MOTIONS TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVERS MUST HAVE A PROPOSED ORDER ATTACHED TO THE MOTION FOR THE COURT'S REVIEW AND SIGNATURE. (THE PROPOSED ORDER MAY ALSO BE SENT ADDITIONALLY AS A WORD DOCUMENT). THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD BY PHONE UNLESS OTHERWISE DOCKETED. THE PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO CALL THE CONFERENCE LINE AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. 1-978-990-5000 - ACCESS CODE 728961#. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY PORTION OF THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS, INCLUDING THIS ORDER, MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, JUDGMENT OR OTHER SANCTIONS. PARTIES ARE TO ABIDE BY THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS CONTAINED HEREIN AND LOCATED AT: HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-NANCY-MARGARET-RUSSO NOTICE ISSUED
  20. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56499923 RETURNED 4/24/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WILDER/ANNETTE/C - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  21. SUMS COMPLAINT(56594765) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: ANNETTE C WILDER 1672 S TAYLOR RD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  22. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  23. WRIT FEE
  24. PRAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  25. MOTION FOR SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER GRANTED OSJ. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. MOTION TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. MOTION TO APPOINT PROCESS SERVER
  27. SUMS COMPLAINT(56499923) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ANNETTE C WILDER 1672 S TAYLOR RD CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  28. WRIT FEE
  29. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  30. JUDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  31. LEGAL RESEARCH
  32. LEGAL NEWS
  33. LEGAL AID
  34. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  35. COMPUTER FEE
  36. CLERK'S FEE
  37. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JAMES P MCGOWAN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more