Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-09
Status Open
Type Domestic Violence With Children
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Dell, Carissa
Defendant Diaz, Santino
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer crass, Steven

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer crass, Steven

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Review Judicial Officer Crass, Steven Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Temp restraining order (any declarations filed 30 days prior?) take the matter off calendar
  2. Domestic Violence OSC
  3. Proof of Service Comment Personal
  4. Substitution of Attorney Comment Old Atty: Pro Se New Atty: Brian N. Folland
  5. TRO Order to Show Cause Original Type TRO Order to Show Cause Judicial Officer Munoz Figueroa, David E. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  6. Appeared in Person
  7. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  8. Reissuance OSC/TRO Comment Last Hearing: Reissued Hearing to:10/4/24
  9. Answer to Temporary Restraining Order Comment Response To Request For Domestic Violence Restraining Order
  10. Proof of Service by Mail
  11. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Electronic Service
  12. Temporary Restraining Order Reissued Original Type Temporary Restraining Order Reissued Judicial Officer Munoz Figueroa, David E. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion
  13. Appeared in Person Comment Atty Haydon
  14. Reissuance OSC/TRO Comment Last Hearing: Reissued Hearing to: 11/13/24
  15. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment Minute Order & DV-116
  16. Notice of Limited Scope Representation Comment Carey Haydon for Hearing and any continuance of that hearing
  17. Trial brief filed
  18. Proof of Service by Mail
  19. Proof of Service Comment Electronic Service
  20. Contested Hearing-TRO Original Type Contested Hearing-TRO Judicial Officer Munoz Figueroa, David E. Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Continued Party's Motion
  21. Appeared in Person
  22. Reissuance OSC/TRO Comment Last Hearing: Reissued Hearing to: 01/29/25
  23. Temporary Restraining Order Comment 1st amended
  24. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment MO & DV-116, DV-110
  25. Proof of Service
  26. Proof of Service
  27. Contested Hearing-TRO Original Type Contested Hearing-TRO Judicial Officer Munoz Figueroa, David E. Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment half-day est. - cont'd from 11/13
  28. Appeared in Person
  29. Reissuance of temporary restraining order Comment Last Hearing: Reissued Hearing to: 01/29/2027
  30. Temporary Restraining Order Comment DV-110 Modified
  31. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment of Minute Order and DV-116 dated
  32. Child Custody and Visitation Order Signed by Judge
  33. Document filed Comment Document: Notice of Completion of Limited Scope Representation

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more