Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-22
Type Fc Other Miscellaneous Actions
Docket 13 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Larkin, Jamie
Defendant Williams, Jasmine
Photo of Hon. Newsham John F

Judge

Hon. Newsham John F

St. Louis County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. onfid Dom Rel Info File Sheet
  2. udge/Clerk - Note NO TAX
  4. rder of Dismissal ON THE COURTS OWN MOTION, CAUSE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PETITIONER FAILED TO APPEAR. COSTS ASSESSED AGAINST THE PARTY FILING THE ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 77.01. COPY TO PARTIES ADDRESS OF RECORD SO ORDERED: JUDGE JOHN F NEWSHAM
  5. ismiss by Ct w/o Prejudice
  6. on Contested Hearing Held Associated Entries: 08/20/2025 - Non Contested Hrng Sched Scheduled For: 09/22/2025; 2:30 PM; JOHN F NEWSHAM; St Louis County
  7. otice of Hearing Filed NOTICE OF HEARING
  8. on Contested Hrng Sched Associated Entries: 09/22/2025 - Non Contested Hearing Held Scheduled For: 09/22/2025; 2:30 PM; JOHN F NEWSHAM; St Louis County
  9. orrespondence Sent
  10. udge Assigned DIV 40 FC07
  11. eceipt Filed
  12. edaction Certification Filed Filed By: JAMIE LARKIN
  13. et Filed in Family Ct PETITION FOR REVIEW

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more