Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-21
Type Divorce
Docket 40 entries
Disposition dismiss
Photo of Hon. Luton John David

Judge

Hon. Luton John David

Wagoner County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR DIVORCE
  2. OCIS FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND FEE
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. ISSUE SUMMONS
  14. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  15. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  16. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  17. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  18. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  19. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  20. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  21. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  22. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  23. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  24. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  25. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  26. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  27. SHERIFF SERVICE FEE
  28. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  29. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  30. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  31. ORIGINAL SUMMONS & RETURN - ELIZABETH ERIN ELGHAZALI SERVED BY SERVING RYAN PATTERSON ON 7/22/25
  32. DS/MIN 8-21-25 DIV DKT LUTON: PET P W/ATTY BRYAN SCHELL. RESP P W/ATTY JENNIFER HEFLIN. MATTER COMES ON FOR T.O HEARING. PET'S ATTY ANNOUNCE DISMISSING FP-25-34 AND RESOLVING ALL ISSUES THROUGH DECREE IN THIS CASE/MATTER (FD-25-193). ARUGMENTS OF COUNSEL HEARD, THE COURT FINDS THAT: RESP'S MOTION TO FILE ANSWER OUT OF TIME GRANTED W/ NO OBJECTION TEMP CUSTODY: JOINT CUSTODY VISITATION: PET- TUE/WED/THUR. (OVERNIGHT) EXCHANGE: RECEIVING PARENT TO PICK UP. CHILD SUPPORT: PARTIES TO REMAIN STATUS QUO. AS PER GUIDELINES (RESERVED BY THE PARTIES) INCOME INFORMATION TO BE EXCHANGED W/IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS. COMMUNICATION: THROUGH TALKING PARENTS. (PARTIES TO SPLIT THE COST) SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED. PARTIES ORDERED TO MEDIATION BEFORE SETTING FINAL TRIAL. JOPC ENTERED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  33. JUDICIAL ORDER FOR PROPER CONDUCT OF PARENTS
  34. COURT ORDER
  35. DOMESTIC RELATIONS SCHEDULING ORDER
  36. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE WITH RESERVATION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND - JENNIFER D HEFLIN
  37. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  38. RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE, RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR PATERNITY, RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT, COUNTERCLAIM, APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS, AND APPLICATION FOR SCHEDULING ORDERS
  39. PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S COUNTERCLAIM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more