Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-18
Type Fc Adult Abuse W/o Stalking
Docket 17 entries
Disposition tried by court-civil

Parties

Plaintiff Acting Pro Se
Defendant Aurentz, Lacie Lynn
Photo of Hon. Bacon Douglas P

Judge

Hon. Bacon Douglas P

Chariton County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. et for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - SIBLING;
  2. FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  3. rd of Protection Served Document ID - 25-AFOP-71; Served To - AURENTZ, LACIE LYNN; Server - SO CHRISTIAN COUNTY-OZARK; Served Date - 03-JUL-25; Served Time - 09:20:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served; Service Text - CONSENT SERVED IN COURT 110 W ELM ST, OZARK
  4. otice of Service 25-AFOP-71.
  5. FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  6. udmt Full Order Protection Terms of additional orders - RES TO STAY 1000 FEET AWAY FROM PET; Original Expiration Date - 07/02/2026;Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Additional Orders by Court - YES;
  7. ull Order of Protection Document ID: 25-AFOP-71, for AURENTZ, LACIE LYNN. CONSENT SERVED IN COURT
  8. ried by Court-Civil
  9. dult Abuse Hearing Held Petitioner appears pro se. Respondent appears pro se. Respondent agrees to consent order for 1 year. Full order of Protection granted for 1 year. So ordered. /s/ Judge Doug Bacon Associated Entries: 06/18/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled + Scheduled For: 07/03/2025; 9:00 AM; DOUGLAS P BACON; Christian
  10. rd of Protection Served Document ID - 25-AEOP-182; Served To - AURENTZ, LACIE LYNN; Server - SO CHRISTIAN COUNTY-OZARK; Served Date - 18-JUN-25; Served Time - 19:42:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served; Service Text - 120 W MT VERNON ST, NIXA, MO 65714
  11. otice of Service 25-AEOP-182.
  12. EXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order was submitted for electronic processing
  13. rder Exparte Order of Protection to be issued by this court. So Ordered. /s/ Judge Steven Ward
  14. x Parte Order Issued Document ID: 25-AEOP-182, for AURENTZ, LACIE LYNN
  15. dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Revised Event Information: New EventTime: 09:00:00; Associated Entries: 07/03/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 07/03/2025; 9:00 AM; DOUGLAS P BACON; Christian
  16. xParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Additional orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - RESPONDENT TO STAY 1000 FT FROM PETITIONER;
  17. onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.