Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Knox Co

Court

Knox Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-14
Status CASE CLOSED
Type Legal Separation With Out Children
Docket 13 entries
Disposition other terminations

Parties

Plaintiff Reffitt, Christine
Defendant Reffitt, Larry
Photo of Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Judge

Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Knox County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. RDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED MATTER BE PLACED ON THE INACTIVE DOCKET FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS IN ORDER FOR THE PARTIES TO ATTEMPT RECONCILIATION. THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A MOTION TO REACTIVATE THE CASE AFTER 90 DAYS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE A NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT MAY BE FILED. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  2. OMPLAINT FOR LEGAL SEPARATION eFiling submission date: 05/14/2025 09:00 AM Attorney: BROWN, KRISTIN E
  3. AIVER OF SERVICE 05/14/2025 09:00 AM Attorney: BROWN, KRISTIN E
  4. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- AFFIDAVIT OF PROPERTY AND DEBT CHRISTINE REFFITT
  5. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- AFFIDAVIT OF BASIC INFORMATION, INCOME AND EXPENSES CHRISTINE REFFITT
  6. TANDARD TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER RESTRAINING PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  7. GREED ENTRY FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  8. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: PLUMLY, NATASHA A Event: TELEPHONE PRE-TRIAL Date: 08/05/2025 Time: 01:30 PM
  9. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: PLUMLY, NATASHA A Event: UNCONTESTED FINAL HEARING Date: 10/16/2025 Time: 02:30 PM Result: HEARING CANCELED
  10. ELEPHONE PRETRIAL ASSIGNMENT / CASE SCHEDULE
  11. AGISTRATE'S ORDER- THE FINAL HEARING SCHEDULED ON OCTOBER 16, 2025, AT 2:30 PM SHALL TAKE PLACE VIA TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH THE MAGISTRATE. IF ANY PARTY DOES NOT WANT TO GO FORWARD ON THEIR MATTER BY TELEPHONE, THEY MUST FILE A WRITTEN OBJECTION TO THE TELEPHONE HEARING NO LATER THAN THREE BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE AND TIME. ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL (IF APPLICABLE) SHALL PROVIDE A TELEPHONE NUMBER TO THE COURT AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE HEARING SO THAT THE COURT MAY CONTACT EACH PARTY AND ATTORNEY FOR THE TELEPHONE HEARING. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS CONTACT INFORMATION TO THE COURT SHALL CONSTITUTE A FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B)
  12. OTION FOR A 90-DAY RECONCILIATION STAY eFiled: 08/05/2025 03:34 PM Attorney: BROWN, KRISTIN E
  13. ERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more