Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- HECK ISSUED TO: JOHN S DILTS (ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF)
- ETITION W/SEPARATION AGREEMENT & WAIVERS Applies To: HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1); HESS, MITCHELL (PETITIONER 2); DILTS, JOHN S (Attorney) on behalf of HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1)
- ARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT Applies To: HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1)
- ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT Applies To: HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1)
- ARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT Applies To: HESS, MITCHELL (PETITIONER 2)
- AGISTRATE'S ORDER-THE PARTIES FAILED TO FILE THE REQUIRED IV-D APPLICATION. THE PARTIES SHALL HAVE 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED IV-D APPLICATION. FAILURE TO FILE THE REQUIRED IV-D APPLICATION COULD RESULT IN APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING THIS COURT DENYING ANY REQUEST FOR CHILD SUPPORT AS PART OF THE ON-GOING ACTION. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
- AGISTRATE'S ORDER -- THIS COURT ISSUED A MAGISTRATE'S ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT A IV-D APPLICATION. THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PARTIES HAVE SATISFIED THE OBLIGATION CONTAINED IN LOCAL RULE 1.4 AND NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED IN THIS REGARD. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
- OURNAL ENTRY - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE TO EXPIRATION OF THE 90-DAY TIME LIMIT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
- ASE FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In