Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-14
Status CASE CLOSED
Type Dissolution With Children
Docket 9 entries
Disposition other terminations

Parties

Plaintiff Hess, Melissa|Hess, Mitchell
Photo of Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Judge

Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Knox County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. HECK ISSUED TO: JOHN S DILTS (ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF)
  2. ETITION W/SEPARATION AGREEMENT & WAIVERS Applies To: HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1); HESS, MITCHELL (PETITIONER 2); DILTS, JOHN S (Attorney) on behalf of HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1)
  3. ARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT Applies To: HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1)
  4. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT Applies To: HESS, MELISSA (PETITIONER 1)
  5. ARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT Applies To: HESS, MITCHELL (PETITIONER 2)
  6. AGISTRATE'S ORDER-THE PARTIES FAILED TO FILE THE REQUIRED IV-D APPLICATION. THE PARTIES SHALL HAVE 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED IV-D APPLICATION. FAILURE TO FILE THE REQUIRED IV-D APPLICATION COULD RESULT IN APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING THIS COURT DENYING ANY REQUEST FOR CHILD SUPPORT AS PART OF THE ON-GOING ACTION. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  7. AGISTRATE'S ORDER -- THIS COURT ISSUED A MAGISTRATE'S ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT A IV-D APPLICATION. THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PARTIES HAVE SATISFIED THE OBLIGATION CONTAINED IN LOCAL RULE 1.4 AND NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED IN THIS REGARD. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  8. OURNAL ENTRY - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE TO EXPIRATION OF THE 90-DAY TIME LIMIT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  9. ASE FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.