Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- udge Assigned
- eceipt Filed DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
- eceipt Filed EMAIL RECEIPTS
- FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
- iling: EMAIL CONFIRMATIONS
- otice Copy of the Judgment of the Full Order of Protection mailed to Petitioner, copy of the Judgment of the Full Order of Protection mailed to Respondent by Certified Mail # 7020 0090 0001 4369 4384, and Emailed to the ExParte Group.
- FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
- udmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 07/01/2026; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Additional Orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - RESPONDENT SHALL IMMEDIATELY VACATE AND/OR SHALL NOT ENTER UPON THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S/THE PARTIES/ RESIDENCE. FURTHER, RESPONDENT SHALL NOT KNOWINGLY ENTER UPON THE PREMISES OF ANY FUTURE RESIDENCE OF PETITIONER. RESPONDENT IS FORBIDDEN TO ENTER OR STAY AT PETITIONER'S RESIDENCE. THIS COURT FINDS THAT, IN ORDER TO ENSURE PETITIONER'S SAFETY, RESPONDENT SHALL NOT: ENTER ONTO THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT, RESPONDENT SHALL NOT COME WITHIN 100 FEET OF PETITIONER.;
- otion Granted/Sustained 07/02/2025 CAUSE CALLED. PETITIONER APPEARS IN PERSON: PRO SE. RESPONDENT: FAILS TO APPEAR. HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD. BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, COURT FINDS THAT PETITIONER HAS: MET PETITIONER'S BURDEN OF PROOF AND IS ENTITLED TO THE RELIEF AS PRAYED. FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION ENTERED AS SIGNED AND FILED HEREIN. SO ORDERED ON 07/02/2025. ROBERT FOULKE - JUDGE
- dult Abuse Hearing Held Associated Entries: 06/17/2025 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 07/02/2025; 10:00 AM; ROBERT JOHN FOULKE; Barry
- ound Recording Log Sheet
- roposed Order Filed PROPOSED JUDGMENT OF THE FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION - ADULT
- eceipt Filed EMAIL RECEIPTS
- iling: EMAIL CONFIRMATIONS
- otice of Court Hearing Sent Notice of Hearing mailed to Petitioner. Notice of Hearing and a copy of the Motion to Renew mailed to Respondent, and Emailed to the ExParte Group.
- otion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/02/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held Scheduled For: 07/02/2025; 10:00 AM; ROBERT JOHN FOULKE; Barry
- rder for Hearing Hearing set for 7/2/25 at 10:00 a.m. So Ordered. Robert Foulke Filed By: ROBERT JOHN FOULKE Associated Entries: 06/13/2025 - Mot for Ext of Ord Protection +
- ot for Ext of Ord Protection EMAILED TO JUDGE. -SP Filed By: Petitioner Associated Entries: 06/16/2025 - Order for Hearing +
- inancial Documents Filed VOID SHEETS
- eceipt Filed RECEIPT FOR EXPARTE FEES PAID
- eceipt Filed EMAIL RECEIPTS
- iling: EMAIL CONFIRMATIONS
- ound Recording Log Sheet
- FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
- otice JUDGMENT OF THE FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION MAILED TO PETITIONER, EMAILED TO EXPARTE GROUP. A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION AND CASE PARTY FEE REPORT MAILED BY CERTFIED MAIL TO RESPONDENT - 7005 1820 0003 9295 2441
- FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
- dult Abuse Costs Taxed COURT COSTS TAXED TO RESPONDENT - PAYMENT PLAN # 103601
- udmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 05-AUG-2025; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - WHEREVER THE PETITIONER MAY RESIDE, BE EMPLOYED, OR BE LOCATED AT.; Additional Orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - PETITIONER IS GRANTED EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION OF THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S RESIDENCE. RESPONDENT SHALL IMMEDIATELY VACATE AND/OR SHALL NOT ENTER UPON THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S RESIDENCE. FURTHER, RESPONDENT SHALL NOT KNOWINGLY ENTER UPON THE PREMISES OF ANY FUTURE RESIDENCE OF PETITIONER. RESPONDENT IS FORBIDDEN TO ENTER OR STAY AT PETITIONER'S RESIDENCE. RESPONDENT SHALL NOT: ENTER ONTO THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT OR COME WITHIN 300 FEET OF PETITIONER.
- ull Order of Protection
- ried by Court-Civil 08/06/2024 CAUSE CALLED. PETITIONER APPEARS IN PERSON: PRO SE. RESPONDENT: FAILS TO APPEAR. HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD. BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, COURT FINDS THAT PETITIONER HAS: MET PETITIONER'S BURDEN OF PROOF AND IS ENTITLED TO THE RELIEF AS PRAYED. FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION ENTERED AS SIGNED AND FILED HEREIN. COSTS ARE: TAXED TO RESPONDENT. SO ORDERED ON 08/06/2024. ROBERT FOULKE - JUDGE Associated Entries: 07/17/2024 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 08/06/2024; 8:30 AM; ROBERT JOHN FOULKE; Barry
- rd of Protection Served Document ID - 24-AEOP-310; Served To - WILLIAMS, TANNER S; Server - [Not Provided]; Served Date - 18-Jul-2024; Served Time - 15:25:00; Service Type - EE; Reason Description - Served
- otice of Service
- roposed Order Filed PROPOSED JUDGMENT OF THE FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION - ADULT
- udge/Clerk - Note EMAILED EXPARTE GROUP & NEWTON COUNTY AN UPDATED COPY OF PETITION WITH PAGE 5 ATTACHED. COPY OF EMAIL AND CONFIRMATIONS ATTACHED.
- eceipt Filed EMAIL RECEIPTS
- iling: EMAIL CONFIRMATIONS
- EXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order was submitted for electronic processing
- xParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - WHEREVER PETITIONER MAY RESIDE, BE EMPLOYED OR BE LOCATED AT; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Resp not to abuse pet(s) - YES
- x Parte Order Issued Document ID: 24-AEOP-310, for WILLIAMS, TANNER SLY. EMAILED TO NEWTON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT FOR SERVICE ON RESPONDENT EMAILED TO EXPARTE GROUP 2 COPIES GIVEN TO PETITIONER AT WINDOW
- dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/06/2024 - Tried by Court-Civil + Scheduled For: 08/06/2024; 8:30 AM; ROBERT JOHN FOULKE; Barry
- onfidential Address Filed
- et for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - INLAW
- onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In