Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-21
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 17 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Midland Credit Management Inc
Defendant John J Smith
Photo of Hon. Deborah M Turner

Judge

Hon. Deborah M Turner

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(58191865) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NEVENKA PAVLOVIC [email protected]
  3. IV. R. 4(E) HEARING HELD ON 09/19/2025. PLAINTIFF FAILED TO APPEAR. DEFENDANT HAS NOT BEEN SERVED WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS. GOOD CAUSE NOT SHOWN. CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE OF SERVICE. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. EARING SET FOR 09/19/2025 AT 10:00 AM. CIV. R. 4(E) HEARING BY PHONE. PLAINTIFF TO CONTACT STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8577 AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING. CASE WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNLESS PLAINTIFF CAN SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SERVICE WAS NOT PERFECTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. EVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT SERVICE HAS NOT BEEN PERFECTED UPON DEFENDANT. PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 4(E), FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DEFENDANT WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT SHALL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS DEFENDANT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION UNLESS PLAINTIFF CAN SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SERVICE WAS NOT PERFECTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56460308 RETURNED 3/27/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SMITH/JOHN /J - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  7. UMS COMPLAINT(56460308) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN J SMITH 24062 SPRAGUE RD OLMSTED FALLS, OH 44138
  8. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  9. RIT FEE
  10. UDGE DEBORAH M TURNER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  11. EGAL RESEARCH
  12. EGAL NEWS
  13. EGAL AID
  14. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  15. OMPUTER FEE
  16. LERK'S FEE
  17. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID NEVENKA PAVLOVIC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more