Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-21
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Crown Asset Management, Llc
Defendant Robert Austin
Photo of Hon. Michael P Shaughnessy

Judge

Hon. Michael P Shaughnessy

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 57573624 RETURNED 07/28/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AUSTIN/ROBERT/ NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(57573624) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ROBERT AUSTIN 11302 PARKVIEW AVE FL 2 CLEVELAND, OH 44104
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(57573623) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CRYSTAL M DUPLAY [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(57573622) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ERIN C ENDERLE [email protected]
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(57573621) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: EDEN R SARVER [email protected]
  7. UDGMENT ENTRY(57573620) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KIMBERLY A. KLEMENOK [email protected]
  8. UDGMENT ENTRY(57573619) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KIMBERLY A. KLEMENOK [email protected]
  9. S A RESULT OF PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S 06/17/2025 ENTRY, THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(B). FINAL. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. HE DOCKET REFLECTS GOOD SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO FILE AN ANSWER. PLAINTIFF IS TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF JOURNALIZATION OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(B). NOTICE ISSUED
  11. REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS SERVICE HAS BEEN COMPLETED UPON DEFENDANT, HOWEVER THE TIME TO ANSWER HAS NOT PASSED. ACCORDINGLY, CMC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 06/12/2025 IS RESET AS FOLLOWS: CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 08/27/2025 AT 10:45 AM. PLAINTIFF IS TO INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL TO DEFENDANT(S), THEN TO THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8674. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 06/12/2025 AT 10:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  13. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 06/12/2025 AT 10:00 AM PLAINTIFF IS TO INITIATE THE CONFERENCE CALL TO DEFENDANT(S), THEN TO THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8674. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(57017159) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ROBERT AUSTIN 11302 PARKVIEW AVE FL 2 CLEVELAND, OH 44104 ANSWER DATE: 06/16/2025
  15. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. RIT FEE
  17. RAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE
  18. REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT SERVICE IS NOT COMPLETE ALTHOUGH THE CASE WAS FILED ON 03/21/2025. IF SERVICE IS NOT PERFECTED BY 09/21/2025, THE CAPTIONED COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED AGAINST SAID DEFENDANT WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). NOTICE ISSUED
  19. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56456989 RETURNED 4/5/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AUSTIN/ROBERT/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. UMS COMPLAINT(56456989) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ROBERT AUSTIN 11302 PARKVIEW AVE FL 2 CLEVELAND, OH 44104
  21. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. RIT FEE
  23. UDGE MICHAEL P SHAUGHNESSY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  24. EGAL RESEARCH
  25. EGAL NEWS
  26. EGAL AID
  27. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  28. OMPUTER FEE
  29. LERK'S FEE
  30. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID EDEN R SARVER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more