Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-21
Status ACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Crown Asset Management, Llc
Defendant Kevin Smith
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. HE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED 9/25/2025, IS MOOT. NOTICE ISSUED
  3. LAINTIFF CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED 9/25/2025, IS DENIED AS UNTIMELY. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. LAINTIFF CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC'S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE 9/30/2025 TRAIL, FILED 9/4/2025, IS DENIED. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
  6. OTION FILED FOR P1 CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC EDEN R SARVER 0074919 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
  7. 1 CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. EDEN R SARVER 0074919
  8. HIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON AUGUST 26, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. NEITHER PARTY APPEARED, AND A TRIAL IS SET FOR THE DATE AND TIME SHOWN BELOW, TO BE HELD IN COURTROOM 18-D OF THE JUSTICE CENTER, 1200 ONTARIO STREET, CLEVELAND. TRIAL SET FOR 09/30/2025 AT 09:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. RETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 08/26/2025 AT 10:00 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. HE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED, AND THE JULY 29, 2025, ANSWER IS DEEMED AS A TIMELY RESPONSIVE PLEADING. THE DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 26, 2025, WILL GO FORWARD AS A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. EFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT . PRO SE (9999999)
  12. EFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, INSTANTER WITH COPY APPENDED
  13. HIS CASE WAS CALLED FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON JULY 3, 2025, AS SCHEDULED. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL AND THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. THE DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER; THEREFORE, THE PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST HIM NO LATER THAN AUGUST 12, 2025, AND A HEARING ON THE ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SET AS FOLLOWS: DEFAULT HEARING IS SET FOR 08/26/2025 AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 18-D. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY SHALL BRING JUDGMENT ENTRY; AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY STATING THAT ACCORDING TO STATUTE AND RULES, SERVICE REQUIREMENTS WERE COMPLIED WITH; AND AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF, OR PLAINTIFF'S REPRESENTATIVE, PROVING DAMAGES. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. SAID LETTER ALSO SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: "JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED AGAINST YOU." NOTICE ISSUED
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(57016922) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: KEVIN SMITH 4008 E 155TH ST CLEVELAND, OH 44128 ANSWER DATE: 06/16/2025
  15. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. RIT FEE
  17. RAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE
  18. RETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/03/2025 AT 10:00 AM. COURTROOM 18-D. IF THE DEFENDANT IS IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER BEFORE THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND THE PLAINTIFF FILES A CIVIL RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, THEN THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE CONVERTED TO A DEFAULT HEARING. PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. SAID LETTER ALSO SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: "JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED AGAINST YOU." NOTICE ISSUED
  19. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56455245 RETURNED 4/15/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SMITH/KEVIN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. UMS COMPLAINT(56455245) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KEVIN SMITH 4008 E 155TH ST CLEVELAND, OH 44128
  21. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. RIT FEE
  23. UDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  24. EGAL RESEARCH
  25. EGAL NEWS
  26. EGAL AID
  27. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  28. OMPUTER FEE
  29. LERK'S FEE
  30. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID EDEN R SARVER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more