Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-22
Type Appeal In Certain Administrative Proceedings
Docket 50 entries
Disposition affirmed

Docket Entries

  2. ocument Transmitted
  3. otion to Withdraw Appearance (Leah Jones) Certificate of Service-Mailed 07/11/24 Party: Review Board File Stamp: 07/11/2024
  4. pinion Certified Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Recker, Abigail Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L Notice Date: 06/25/2024
  5. ocument Transmitted
  6. pinion Issued Memorandum Decision Memorandum Decision MEMORANDUM DECISION: Affirmed - Bailey, J. Crone, J., and Pyle, J., concur. Judicial Officer: Bailey, Lloyd Mark Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Recker, Abigail Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L File Stamp: 04/29/2024
  7. ocument Transmitted
  8. ase Fully Briefed Oral Argument Requested: No FB Date: 04/04/2024
  9. ransmitted to Court of Appeals
  10. rief and Appendix - Appellee Volumes of Appendix: Two (2) Certificate of Service-Mailed 03/06/24 Attorney: Recker, Abigail Party: Review Board File Stamp: 03/06/2024
  11. ppearance by Deputy AG DAG Recker - Certificate of Service-Mailed 02/22/24 DAG: Recker, Abigail Party: Review Board File Stamp: 02/22/2024
  12. rder Granting Motion for Extension of Time To File Brief order granting extension of time Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellee's Verified Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief of Appellee is granted. 2. Appellee's Brief is due by March 6, 2024. Judicial Officer: Brown, Elaine B. Party: Review Board Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L File Stamp: 02/02/2024
  13. ocument Transmitted
  14. otion for Extension of Time to File Brief Certificate of Service-Mailed 01/29/24 Attorney: Corey, David Party: Review Board File Stamp: 01/29/2024
  15. rder Denying Motion for Permission to File a Belated Brief order denying belated brief Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's December 14, 2023 Motion for Belated Brief is denied as moot. 2. The directives in the Court's January 4, 2024 order remain unchanged. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: V, L Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L File Stamp: 01/11/2024
  16. ocument Transmitted
  17. rief - Appellant Certificate of Service-Mailed 12/12/2023 Attorney: V, L Party: V, L File Stamp: 01/04/2024
  18. rder Issued order reinstating appeal and granting belated brief Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's Petition for Rehearing and Motion for Belated Brief are both granted. This appeal is hereby reinstated. 2. The Clerk of this Court is directed to file, as of the date of this order, Appellant's Brief received on December 18, 2023. 3. Appellee's Brief is due within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Bailey, Brown, JJ., Najam, Sr.J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L File Stamp: 01/04/2024
  19. ocument Transmitted
  20. otion for Permission to File a Belated Brief/Petition Certificate of Service-Mailed 12/14/2023 Attorney: V, L File Stamp: 12/14/2023
  21. otion for Permission to File a Belated Brief/Petition Certificate of Service- Mailed 12/12/2023 Attorney: V, L Party: V, L File Stamp: 12/12/2023
  22. eceived Document Receive Date: 12/18/2023 Brief- Appellant **Untimely* PostmarkDate: 12/12/2023
  23. etition for Rehearing Certificate of Service- Mailed 12/12/2023 Party: V, L File Stamp: 12/12/2023
  24. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Petition for Rehearing- Appellant Party: V, L Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay File Stamp: 12/12/2023
  25. ocument Transmitted
  26. ate & Defective Document Letter Issued Brief-Appellant Party: V, L Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Issue Date: 12/08/2023
  27. otice of Defect Issued Petition for Rehearing- Appellant Party: V, L Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Issue Date: 12/08/2023
  28. ocument Transmitted
  29. ocument Transmitted
  30. ppendix Filed Volumes of Appendices: 2 Certificate of Service- Mailed 11/29/2023 Attorney: V, L Party: V, L File Stamp: 11/29/2023
  31. eceived Document Receive Date: 12/01/2023 Brief- Appellant **Untimely; lacks appealed order** PostmarkDate: 11/29/2023
  32. eceived Document Receive Date: 12/1/2023 Petition for Rehearing- Appellant **Tendered with attachments not permitted** PostmarkDate: 11/29/2023
  33. rder Dismissing Appeal with Prejudice order dismissing appeal Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellee's Motion for Clarification of Due Date for Appellee's Brief is granted in part. 2. Because Appellant has failed to timely file the Appellant's brief, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. See App. R. 45(D). 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send this order to the parties. 4. The Review Board is directed to file this order under Cause Numbers 23-R- 2196, 23-R-2197, 23-R-2198. 23-R-2199, 23-R-2200; 23-R-2201, 23-R-2202, 23-R-2203, and 23R-2204. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L File Stamp: 11/20/2023
  34. ocument Transmitted
  35. otion to Clarify Certificate of Service-Mailed 10/18/23 Attorney: Corey, David Party: Review Board File Stamp: 10/18/2023
  36. rder Granting Motion to Consolidate Appeals order granting motion to consolidate appeal Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. The Motion to Consolidate Appeals is granted. 2. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 38, the Court consolidates Cause Numbers 23A-EX-2255, 23A-EX-2256, 23A-EX-2257, 23A-EX- 2258, 23A-EX-2259, 23A-EX-2260, 23A-EX-2261, and 23A-EX- 2262 under Cause Number 23A-EX-2254. 3. All further filings are to be made under Cause Number 23A-EX- 2254. 4. Pursuant to the orders issued on October 3, 2023 in Cause Numbers 23A-EX-2255, 23A-EX-2256, 23A-EX-2257, 23A-EX-2258, 23AEX- 2259, 23A-EX-2260, 23A-EX-2261, and 23A-EX-2262, Appellant may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. 5. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 45(B)(1)(b), Appellant's Brief is due on October 30, 2023. 6. The Clerk of this Court is directed to file this order in Cause Numbers 23A-EX-2254, 23A-EX-2255, 23A-EX-2256, 23A-EX- 2257, 23A-EX-2258, 23A-EX-2259, 23A-EX-2260, 23A-EX-2261, and 23A-EX-2262. 7. The Review Board is directed to file this order in Cause Numbers 23-R-2196, 23-R-2197, 23-R-2198, 23-R-2199, 23-R-2200, 23-R- 2201, 23-R-2202, 23-R-2203, and 23-R-2204. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: Review Board Serve: Corey, David Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L File Stamp: 10/05/2023
  37. ote Per the order issued on 10/5/2023, this case has been consolidated with 23A-EX-2255, 23A-EX-2256, 23A-EX-2257, 23A-EX-2258, 23A-EX-2259, 23A-EX-2260, 23A-EX-2261, and 23A-EX-2262. All filings from 23A-EX-2255, 23A-EX-2256, 23A-EX-2257, 23A-EX-2258, 23A-EX-2259, 23A-EX-2260, 23A-EX-2261, and 23A-EX-2262 have been transferred to this cause number. All future filings for lower cause number(s) 23-R-2196, 23-R-2197, 23-R-2198, 23-R-2199, 23-R-2200, 23-R-2201, 23-R-2202, 23-R-2203, and 23-R-2204. should be filed under this cause number.
  38. ocument Transmitted
  39. ppearance by Deputy AG David E. Corey Certificate of Service-Mailed 10/03/23 DAG: Corey, David Party: Review Board File Stamp: 10/03/2023
  40. otion to Consolidate Appeals Certificate of Service-Mailed 10/03/23 Attorney: Corey, David Party: Review Board File Stamp: 10/03/2023
  41. rder Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis order denying pauper status Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: Appellant's Motion to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis is denied. Mathias, Tavitas, JJ., Baker, Sr. J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: V, L Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: V, L File Stamp: 09/29/2023
  42. ocument Transmitted
  43. ppearance -J. Parks and L. Jones Certificate of Service-Mailed 09/28/23 Attorney: Parks, Jay Party: Review Board File Stamp: 09/28/2023
  44. otice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Requested Certificate of Service-Mailed 09/28/23 File Stamp: 09/28/2023
  45. otice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service-Mailed 09/20/23 Attorney: V, L Party: V, L File Stamp: 09/22/2023
  46. OA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 09/26/2023
  47. otion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Certificate of Service-Mailed 09/20/23 (Appellant indicates service on ALJ so this was allowed to serve as service to Review Board) Attorney: V, L Party: V, L File Stamp: 09/22/2023
  48. otice Regarding Case Creation Party: V, L Serve: V, L Notice Sent: 09/26/2023
  49. ocument Transmitted
  50. ocument Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more