Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
- LAW LIBRARY FEE
- DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 7-'04
- LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR PROTECITVE ORDER
- ISSUED TO TCSO
- EMERGENCY EX PARTE ISSUED TO TCSO
- EPO W/RETURN OF SERVICE BY SHERIFF
- CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- CONTINUED EPO
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- CM: MINUTE/ORDER
- BOTH PARTIES APPEARED. DEFT'S ATTY MR. LIEBMAN
- REQUESTED DISMISSAL, PETITIONER REQUESTED TIME TO
- OBTAIN A POLICE REPORT. COURT GRANTED PET'S
- CONTINUANCE. FINAL HRG AND EPO ARE CONTINUED TO
- NOVEMBER 21, 2023 AT 11AM.
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- CM: MINUTE/ORDER (FROM HEARING ON NOVEMBER 21, 2023) PARTIES AGREED TO CONSOLIDATE THE FINAL HEARING IN PO-23-33, 34, 50 AND PO-23-51 AS THE CASES INVOLVED THE SAME PARTIES AND SIMILIAR INCIDENTS.COURT HEARD SWORN TESTIMONIES. COURT ADMITTED PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 1. COURT DID NOT HEAR SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO ISSUE A FINAL PO, CASE DISMISSED. NO COSTS ASSESSED AGAINST EITHER PARTY.
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
- REDUCED BY 100%
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In