Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-27
Type Petition For Injunction
Docket 31 entries
Photo of Hon. MILLS, TIM

Judge

Hon. MILLS, TIM

Muskogee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE AND ENTER PETITION
  2. OKLA. COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. F AND E ISSUING SUMMONS TO PCSO
  14. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE
  15. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
  16. NOTICE AND ORDER FOR HEARING; DECEMBER 18, 2024 AT 1:00PM S/MILLS
  17. RETURNED SUMMONS: KEITH COPELAND SERVED 12/2/24 BY DEPUTY J. LYLES PCSO
  18. CM 12/18/24 COMES ON FOR: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. RULING: DEFENDANT'S ANSWER DUE BY 1/9/25. HEARING HELD PLAINTIFF RESTS DEFENDANT STILL NEEDS TO PRESENT HIS CASE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION IS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 23, 2024 AT 1:00PM. PARTIES TO KEEP STATUS QUO IN THE MEANTIME. S/MILLS
  19. CM 12/20/24 ORDER RESETTING CONTINUATION OF HEARING HELD ON 12/18/2024. RULING: CONTINUATION OF HEARING STARTED ON 12/18/2024 THAT IS CURRENTLY SET ON DECEMBER 23, 2024, IS HEREBY RESCHEDULED TO JANUARY 9, 2025, AT 11:00 A.M. DUE TO A SCHEDULING CONFLICT OF THE COURT. BOTH PARTIES WERE NOTIFIED TELEPHONICALLY THIS DATE BY SECRETARY BAILIFF: M. JONES. S/MILLS
  20. CM COMES ON FOR: ORDER STRIKING HEARING. RULING: HEARING SET ON 1/21/25 AT 2:30PM IS HEREBY STRICKEN. IN LIGHT OF RECENT PLEADINGS, PLNTF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, PLNTF'S PETITION, & DEFT'S COUNTER CLAIMS, AND A PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE SHALL BE SET ON MOTION OF EITHER PARTY ONCE DISCOVERY IS COMPLETE. S/MILLS
  21. DEFENDANT'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF
  22. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
  23. PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM
  24. ORDER S/MILLS
  25. MOTION TO SET FOR NON-JURY TRIAL
  26. ORDER SETTING MOTION TO SET TRIAL DATE; SET FOR SEPTEMBER 24, 2025 AT 10:00AM. S/MILLS
  27. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO AMEND PETITION
  28. ORDER FOR HEARING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO AMEND PETITION; SET FOR SEPTEMBER 24, 2025 AT 10:00AM. S/MILLS
  29. CM 9/24/25 COMES ON FOR: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SET NON-JURY TRIAL. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO AMEND PETITION. MICHAEL PARKS APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF. KEITH COPELAN APPEARS IN PERSON PRO SE. RULING: PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PETITION IS GRANTED. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE SET NOVEMBER 18, 2025 AT 1:30PM. S/MILLS
  30. FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR CANCELLATION, SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, INJUNCTION, AND FORECLOSURE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more