Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-02
Type Appeal In Certain Administrative Proceedings
Docket 21 entries
Disposition appeal is dismissed

Docket Entries

  1. ocument Transmitted
  2. rder Granting Motion and Dismissing Appeal with Prejudice order granting motion to dismiss Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellee's Motion for Involuntary Dismissal is granted, and this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. See App. R. 45(D). 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send this order to the parties. 3. The Review Board is directed to file this order under Cause Number 24-R- 2741. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: Review Board Serve: G, P Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: Weiss, Natalie File Stamp: 04/09/2025
  3. ocument Transmitted
  4. ocument Transmitted
  5. otion to Dismiss Certificate of Service-Mailed 03/19/25 Attorney: Weiss, Natalie Party: Review Board File Stamp: 03/19/2025
  6. rder Granting Motion to Consolidate Appeals order granting motion to consolidate Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellee's Verified Motion to Consolidate Appeals is granted. 2. Pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 38, this Court consolidates Cause Nos. 25A-EX-60 and 25A-EX-61 under Cause No. 25AEX- 55. 3. All future filings are to be made under Cause No. 25A-EX-55. 4. Appellant's consolidated brief and appendix are due within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send this order to the parties. 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file this order in Cause Nos. 25A-EX-55, 25A-EX-60, and 25A-EX-61. 7. The Review Board is directed to file this order in Cause Nos. 24-R- 2741, 24-R-2744 and 24-R-2791. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: Review Board Serve: G, P Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Rokita, Theodore Serve: Weiss, Natalie File Stamp: 02/04/2025
  7. ote Per the order issued on 2/4/25, this case has been consolidated with 25A-EX-60 and 25A-EX-61. All filings from 25A-EX-60 and 25A-EX-61 have been transferred to this cause number. All future filings for lower cause number(s) 24-R-2741, 24-R-2744 and 24-R-2791 should be filed under this cause number.
  8. ocument Transmitted
  9. ocument Not Corrected Pursuant to Notice of Defect Issued Clerk Comments: Motion to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis Party: G, P Serve: Parks, Jay Serve: Weiss, Natalie Date Sent: 02/03/2025
  10. ocument Transmitted
  11. ppearance by Deputy AG Certificate of Service-Mailed 01/23/2025 DAG: Weiss, Natalie Party: Review Board File Stamp: 01/23/2025
  12. otion to Consolidate Appeals Certificate of Service-Mailed 01/23/25 Attorney: Weiss, Natalie Party: Review Board File Stamp: 01/23/2025
  13. ppearance (Jay R.S. Parks) Certificate of Service-Mailed 01/14/25 Attorney: Parks, Jay Party: Review Board File Stamp: 01/14/2025
  14. otice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Requested Certificate of Service-Mailed 01/14/25 File Stamp: 01/14/2025
  15. otice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service-Not Provided Attorney: G, P Party: G, P File Stamp: 01/02/2025
  16. OA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 01/09/2025
  17. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/02/25 Motion to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis - lacks Certficate of Service PostmarkDate: 01/02/2025
  18. otice Regarding Case Creation Party: G, P Notice Sent: 01/09/2025
  19. ocument Transmitted
  20. ocument Transmitted
  21. otice of Defect Issued Motion to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis Party: G, P Serve: Rokita, Theodore Issue Date: 01/09/2025

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more