Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- FILE & ENTER PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- EPO ISSUED TO CCSO
- EPO RETURN-SERVED
- MO 5/21; PARTIES AGREE/COURT ORDERS PO-24-100 AND FP-24-09 CONSOLIDATED AND HEARD TOGETHER THIS DATE; ALL ISSUES (BOTH CASES) HEARD AND TAKEN UA; AFTER CONSIDERATION, THE COURT FINDS CUSTODY TO PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT ORDERED TO SUBMIT TO A NAILBED DRUG EXAM @ DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES AND @ A FACILITY AGREEABLE TO PARTIES ; DEFENDANT ORDERED TO BEGIN FAMILY / ANGER COUNSELING; AFTERABOVE; DEFENDANT AWARDED VISITATION 1ST, 2ND AND 4TH WEEKENDS (WEEKEND = 6PM FRIDAY TO 8AM MONDAY) CS @ GUIDELINES; TPO TO REMAIN IN PLACE; PO REV AS INDICATED; MS WALES DIRECTED TO DRAW FORMAL ORDER W/IN 10 DYAS; DRUG TESTING SUBJECT TO RE-ALLOCATION; (ITS THE COURTS INTENT FOR VISITS TO BEGIN ASAP); PARTIES MAY REQUEST VISITATION REVIEW UPON APP; NEXT HEARING SET FOR 7/25/24 @9AM; JM
- MO 5/30; CONSOLIDATED WITH FP -24-009
- MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
- MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
- ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
- MO 8/26; PLAINTIFF APPEARS W/ D.WALES, DEFENDANT APPEARS W/ W.CONNOR, PO-24-100 DISMISSED BY AGREEMENT, PARTIES REQUEST/COURT ORDERS MUTUAL RESTRAINING ORDER (IN FP-24-9), PARTIES TO COMMUNICATE ONLY IN A REASONABLE FASHION AND ONLY AS TO THE PARTIES CHILD AND/OR PROPERTY, OTHERWISE NO CONTACT; JM
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In