Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of San Diego Court

Court

San Diego Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-22
Status Pending
Type (u)other Pi/pd/wd: Pi/pd Other
Docket 19 entries

Parties

Defendant City Of Encinitas|Energy Excavations Inc|Hp Communications Inc
Photo of Hon. Cynthia a Freeland

Judge

Hon. Cynthia a Freeland

San Diego County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT-CIVIL (Acknowledgments) Filed by Tyler Overstreet Filed By: Plaintiff Overstreet, Tyler
  2. Case Management Statement Case Management Statement Filed by City of Encinitas Filed By: Defendant City of Encinitas
  3. Request for Dismissal of Party, Cause of Actn, or Cross-Comp With Prejudice - as Video Voice Data Communications ONLY on Cross-Complaint filed 5/5/25 Filed by Ubiquity California LLC Filed By: Cross Complainant Ubiquity California LLC Refers To: Cross Defendant Video Voice Data Communications
  4. Request for Dismissal of Party, Cause of Actn, or Cross-Comp With Prejudice - as Video Voice Data Communications ONLY on Amended Cross-Complaint filed 4/3/25 Filed by Ting Internet LLC Filed By: Cross Complainant Ting Internet LLC Refers To: Cross Defendant Video Voice Data Communications
  5. Proof of Service Proof of Service Filed by North County Traffic Control Inc Filed By: Cross Defendant North County Traffic Control Inc Refers To: Defendant HP Communications Inc Plaintiff Overstreet, Tyler Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc Defendant Overstreet, Vivian Defendant City of Encinitas Defendant Ting Internet LLC Defendant Ubiquity California LLC Cross Defendant Energy Excavations Inc Cross Defendant Video Voice Data Communications Other Byron, Kaden D Cross Complainant HP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Defendant/Respondent Video Voice Data Communications Defendant UBIQUITY CALIFORNIA, LLC
  6. Substitution of Attorney Civil (without Court Order) Substitution of Attorney Civil (without Court Order) Filed by North County Traffic Control Inc Filed By: Cross Defendant North County Traffic Control Inc Refers To: Defendant HP Communications Inc Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc Plaintiff Overstreet, Tyler Plaintiff Overstreet, Vivian Defendant City of Encinitas Cross Defendant Ting Internet LLC Cross Defendant Ubiquity California LLC Cross Defendant Video Voice Data Communications Cross Defendant Energy Excavations Inc Other Byron, Kaden D Cross Complainant HP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Defendant/Respondent Video Voice Data Communications Defendant UBIQUITY CALIFORNIA, LLC
  7. Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Proof of Service of Summons - Personal (re Cross-Complaint of Ting) Filed by Ting Internet LLC, Ubiquity California LLC Filed By: Defendant Ting Internet LLC Defendant Ubiquity California LLC
  8. Proof of Service of Summons - Personal Proof of Service of Summons - Personal (re Cross-Complaint of Ubiquity) Filed by Ting Internet LLC, Ubiquity California LLC Filed By: Defendant Ting Internet LLC Defendant Ubiquity California LLC
  9. Proof of Service 1/9/2026 Filed by Mitchell J Architecture Inc Filed By: Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc
  10. Proposed Order 1/9/2026 Filed by Mitchell J Architecture Inc Filed By: Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc
  11. Declaration 1/9/2026 Filed by Mitchell J Architecture Inc Filed By: Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc
  12. Memorandum of Points & Authorities 1/9/2026 Filed by Mitchell J Architecture Inc Filed By: Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc
  13. Demurrer 1/9/2026 Filed by Mitchell J Architecture Inc Filed By: Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc
  14. Proof of Service Proof of Service Filed by Mitchell J Architecture Inc Filed By: Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc
  15. Response DEFENDANT CROSS-DEFENDANT MITCHELL J. ARCHITECTURE, INC.S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRIOR PLEADINGS AND DISCOVERY Filed by Mitchell J Architecture Inc Filed By: Defendant Mitchell J Architecture Inc
  16. Answer/Response/Denial (Unlimited) Filed by Ubiquity California LLC Filed By: Defendant Ubiquity California LLC
  17. Proof of Service NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPTCIVIL (Comment) Filed by Tyler Overstreet Filed By: Plaintiff Overstreet, Tyler
  18. Answer to Cross-Complaint Filed by HP Communications Inc Filed By: Cross Defendant HP Communications Inc
  19. Answer/Response/Denial (Unlimited) Filed by HP Communications Inc Filed By: Defendant HP Communications Inc

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more