Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Show Cause Regard Harassment Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Hearing Time 8:32 AM
- Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to Dept: 97D Order for: Notice of Court HRG
- Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to Dept: 97D Order for: TRO
- Order Received for Signature Comment Forwarded to Dept: 97D Order for: TCV-51 court findings
- Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order Original Type Chambers Work - Harassment Restraining Order Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Hearing Time 5:33 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
- Notice of Hearing and TRO Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Comment Temporary Restraining Order Granted. Date: Time: 8:30 am Dept: 97D
- Proof of Service
- Order Received for Signature Comment After Hearing
- Gun Violence Hearing Original Type Gun Violence Hearing Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Hearing Time 8:32 AM Result Heard
- Minute Order Attachment
- Appeared in Person
- Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the ( 08.18.25 Minute Order ) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on ( ) Parties served: ( Neal Costanzo by ES )
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In