Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-20
Status INACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket
Docket 39 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Pierer Mobility North America, Inc.
Defendant The Velo House, Llc|Michael Musil
Photo of Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Judge

Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(57816885) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MICHAEL MUSIL 660 DOVER CENTER RD #129 BAY VILLAGE, OH 44140
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(57816884) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: THE VELO HOUSE, LLC 26725 E. OVIATT RD. SERVE: MICHAEL MUSIL, AGENT BAY VILLAGE, OH 44140
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(57816883) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ERNEST V THOMAS [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(57816882) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ERNEST V THOMAS [email protected]
  6. ASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 08/12/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL; DEFENDANTS THE VELO HOUSE, LLC AND MICHAEL MUSIL FAILED TO APPEAR. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS THE VELO HOUSE, INC. AND MICHAEL MUSIL, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $81,086.74 WHICH COMPRISES $80,586.74 IN DAMAGES TO THE PLAINTIFF AND $500 FOR ATTORNEY FEES TO THOMAS & THOMAS UNDER THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES, PLUS INTEREST AT THE APPLICABLE STATUTORY RATE FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. FINAL. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. OTICE FILED BY P1 PIERER MOBILITY NORTH AMERICA, INC. ATTORNEY ERNEST V THOMAS 0011371 LCUYAS TO DEFENDANTS
  8. MC HEARING BY PHONE HELD 07/03/2025 AT 11 AM. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. DEFENDANT DID NOT APPEAR. THE PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON 06/02/2025. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 08/12/2025 AT 1:30 PM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. PLAINTIFF SHALL APPEAR AT ALL OTHER PREVIOUSLY SET COURT DATES. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 978-990-5000 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 701774# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MUST FILE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, EVEN IF THEY HAVE ALREADY BEEN ATTACHED TO THE COMPLAINT OR MOTION, NO LATER THAN 08/05/2025. FAILURE TO FILE ANY OF THESE ITEMS BY SAID DATE SHALL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION: 1. THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT -- EVEN IF ALREADY ATTACHED TO THE COMPLAINT OR MOTION. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. JUDGMENT ENTRY REFLECTING PRINCIPAL DUE WITHOUT REGARD TO ACCRUED INTEREST. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY AVERRING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND RULES CONTAINING ATTACHMENT(S) THAT DEMONSTRATE PROOF OF SERVICE. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY THE PLAINTIFF(S) OR PLAINTIFFS' REPRESENTATIVE PROVING DAMAGES. FAILURE TO FILE THIS ITEM WILL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S CASE BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE ANY OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED ITEMS SHALL RESULT IN PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BEING DENIED AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BEING DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. PROOF OF ASSIGNMENT(S) REQUIRED IN ACCOUNT CASES: PLAINTIFF(S) MUST PROVE STANDING BY PROVIDING AUTHENTICATED COPIES OF ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS OF THE ACCOUNT(S), INCLUDING THE DATE OF ASSIGNMENT, PLUS PROOF OF THE AMOUNT OF PRINCIPAL DUE & OWING AT THE TIME THE DEBT WAS CHARGED OFF BY THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR. BLANKET ASSIGNMENTS THAT CONTAIN NO REFERENCE TO THE DEBTOR'S NAME AND/OR ACCOUNT(S) WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. WITHOUT THESE ITEMS OF PROOF, DEFAULT JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE GRANTED AND THE CASE WILL BE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO CIV.R 41(B). DEFAULT: NOTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT(S): PLAINTIFFS ARE REQUIRED TO NOTIFY IN WRITING ALL PARTIES AGAINST WHOM DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS SOUGHT OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DEFAULT HEARING BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE HEARING DATE. NOTE: IF PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT NOTIFIED DEFAULTING DEFENDANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT, THEN DEFAULT JUDGMENT WILL NOT BE GRANTED AND CASE WILL BE DISMISSED. PROOF OF TIMELY MAILING OF SUCH NOTICE WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE DEFAULT HEARING. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT OR PROOF OF CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ATTEMPTS, AVAILABLE FROM THE USPS WEBSITE, IS REQUIRED ALSO. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 08/12/2025 AT 01:30 PM. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. OTICE FILED BY P1 PIERER MOBILITY NORTH AMERICA, INC. ATTORNEY ERNEST V THOMAS 0011371 LCUYAS TO DEFENDANTS
  10. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 08/24/2025 - UNKNOWN
  11. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 07/03/2025 AT 11AM. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 978-990-5000 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 701774# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR FOR THIS CMC WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. PRIOR TO THE CMC, PARTIES MUST EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(B)(3) AND DRAFT A PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(F). COUNSEL SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT THE PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE CMC. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO CONFER, PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE WITH THE COURT OF EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/03/2025 AT 11:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. UDGE EMILY HAGAN (373) REMOVED - TRANSF'D TO COMMERCIAL DOCKET. CASE REASSIGNED TO CASSANDRA COLLIER-WILLIAMS (365) (RANDOM). NOTICE ISSUED
  13. URSUANT TO SUP.R 49.07(C), THIS MATTER IS REFERRED TO ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE FOR REASSIGNMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL DOCKET. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56490138 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/29/2025 MUSIL/MICHAEL/ PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  15. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56490137 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/29/2025 THE VELO HOUSE, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  16. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56442173 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/26/2025 MUSIL/MICHAEL/ PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  17. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56442172 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/26/2025 THE VELO HOUSE, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 04/02/2025.
  18. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(56490138) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MICHAEL MUSIL 660 DOVER CENTER RD #129 BAY VILLAGE, OH 44140
  19. UMS AMENDED COMPLNT(56490137) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE VELO HOUSE, LLC SERVE: MICHAEL MUSIL, AGENT 26725 E. OVIATT RD. BAY VILLAGE, OH 44140-0000
  20. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. RIT FEE
  23. RIT FEE
  24. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ERNEST V THOMAS
  25. MENDED COMPLAINT $75 AMENDED COMPLAINT
  26. UMS COMPLAINT(56442173) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MICHAEL MUSIL 660 DOVER CENTER RD #129 BAY VILLAGE, OH 44140
  27. UMS COMPLAINT(56442172) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE VELO HOUSE, LLC 26725 E. OVIATT RD. SERVE: MICHAEL MUSIL, AGENT BAY VILLAGE, OH 44140
  28. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  29. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  30. RIT FEE
  31. RIT FEE
  32. UDGE EMILY HAGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  33. EGAL RESEARCH
  34. EGAL NEWS
  35. EGAL AID
  36. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  37. OMPUTER FEE
  38. LERK'S FEE
  39. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ERNEST V THOMAS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more