Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-18
Status ACTIVE
Type Crim Appeal Circuit To District
Docket 32 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bent, Dennis Wilberforce
Defendant State Of Florida
Photo of Hon. Estrada Peter

Judge

Hon. Estrada Peter

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case 282024AP000055APAXMX Filed with Clerk on 10/18/2024
  2. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER : COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT HAS FILED A BRIEF ASSERTING NO ARGUABLE MERIT IN THIS CASE. APPELLANT MAY WITHIN THIRTY DAYS IF WISHES TO DO SO, FILE AN ADDITIONAL BRIEF CALLING THE COURT'S ATTENTION TO ANY MATTER ( 6D2024-2276 )
  3. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: ATTY MALDONADO SHALL SERVE AN ITITAL BRIEF ON OR BEFORE 3/17/25
  4. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: ATTY MALDONADO SHALL SERVE AN ITITAL BRIEF ON OR BEFORE 3/17/25
  5. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: ATTY MALDONADO SHALL SERVE AN ITITAL BRIEF ON OR BEFORE 3/17/25
  6. Appellant Attorney: DAVID MALDONADO Assigned to FACC.CLERICUS.Identity.NamesBAO
  7. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THE OFFICE OF REGIOAL COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW IS GRANTED. JURISDICTION IS RELINQUISHED TO THE TRIAL COURT TO APPOINT CONFLICT FREE COUNSEL (6D 24-2276)
  8. ORDER GRANTING COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING NEW COUNSEL (DAVID MALDONADO)
  9. ORDER GRANTING COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING NEW COUNSEL (ORC) SENT TO 6DCA AND ALL PARTIES
  10. Appellant Attorney: ITA M NEYMOTIN Assigned to FACC.CLERICUS.Identity.NamesBAO
  11. ORDER GRANTING COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING NEW COUNSEL (ORC)
  12. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW DUE TO CONFLICT IS GRANTED. JURISDICTION IS RETURNED TO THE LOWER COURT TO APPOINT CONFLICT FREE COUNSEL (6D 24-2276)
  13. APPEAL PACKAGE-TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS
  14. APPEAL PACKAGE-RECORD
  15. APPEAL RECORD (6D 24-2276) SENT TO APPEALS COURT 6DCA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE PUBLIC DEFENDER
  16. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THE COURT REPORTER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED UNTIL DECEMBER 24, 2024 (6D 24-2276)
  17. Agency Case Number modified: 6D 24-2276
  18. ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM DISTRICT COURT (6D 24-2276)
  19. NOTICE OF APPEAL PLEADINGS SENT TO THE 6DCA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AND ECR
  20. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
  21. Appellant Attorney: HOWARD L DIMMIG Assigned to FACC.CLERICUS.Identity.NamesBAO
  22. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINT PUBLIC DEFENDER TO TAKE APPEAL
  23. Appellee Attorney: ASHLEY MOODY Assigned to FACC.CLERICUS.Identity.NamesBAO
  24. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL (DANIEL HERNANDEZ)
  25. DESIGNATION TO COURT REPORTER
  26. DIRECTIONS TO THE CLERK
  27. STATEMENT OF JUDICIAL ACTS TO BE REVIEWED
  28. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  29. Judge: ESTRADA , PETER FRANK Assigned
  30. State Attorney Case Number modified: CF19-916, 20-392, 20-490
  31. Prosecutor: ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY Assigned
  32. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more