Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- FILE & ENTER PETITION
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- SUMMONS - STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
- SUMMON RETURNED SERVED 12/2/24
- OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DOCKET RECORD OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF BIG TIME BILLBOARDS, LLC, CASE NO 2024-1, ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DOCUMENTS
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE, SYDNEY COLLINS FOR DEFENDANT
- ODOT'S ANSWER
- BIG TIME'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND INCORPORATED BRIEF IN SUPPORT
- CM:LP:7-31-25 - DISPO DOCKET - ANDREW SHANK PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 9-11-25 @ 1:30 PM
- NOTICE OF HEARING
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- ODOT'S MOTION TO DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDMUS AND STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- BIG TIME'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO ODOT'S MOTION TO DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In