Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-08
Status Fast Track Briefing in Progress
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Other
Docket 15 entries
Photo of Hon. Shirinian, Ara

Judge

Hon. Shirinian, Ara

Nevada Appellate Court

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. iled Order Concluding Settlement Proceedings in Docket Nos. 90909. On August 26, 2025, the settlement judge filed a report in Docket No. 90909 indicating that the parties were unable to agree to a settlement. Accordingly, settlement proceedings are concluded. On September 4, 2025, this court granted appellant's motion to consolidate this appeal with Docket No. 90510. The parties shall follow the briefing schedule set forth in that order. Nos. 90510/90909 (SC)
  2. iled SEALED Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)
  3. ssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 7 days. (SC)
  4. -Payment $250.00 from Eric N. Tran. (SC)
  5. ssued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. Docketing statement due: 21 days. (SC)
  6. ssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Ara H. Shirinian. (SC)
  7. iled Appellant's Docketing Statement. (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 8/4/25) (SC)
  8. iled Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Docketing Statement. Corrected Docketing Statement due: 14 days from the date of this order. (SC)
  9. iled ECAR/Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is appropriate for mediation and a settlement conference is scheduled for August 21, 2025, at 10:30 AM. (SC)
  10. iled Filed Appellant' Motion to consolidate case no 90510 and case no 90909 into case no 90510 (SC)
  11. iled Appellant's Notice of Withdraw of Counsel for Elisabeth Flemming. (SC)
  12. iled Appellant's Docketing Statement. (SC)
  13. iled Final Report/No Settlement. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. (SC)
  14. iled FiledAppellant' Motion to consolidate case no 90510 and case no 90909 into case no 90510 (SC)
  15. iled Order Regarding Motions. Docket No. 90510 is a fast track child custody appeal from a district court order finally establishing child custody, denying a motion to alter or amend the decree of custody, and denying a motion to enforce agreement for joint physical custody. Docket No. 90909 is an appeal from a district court order awarding attorney fees. These appeals arise from the same district court case and involve the same counsel and parties. Accordingly, appellant's motion to consolidate is granted. Accordingly, appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve a supplemental fast track opening brief addressing the attorney fees order appealed in Docket No. 90909. Thereafter, respondent shall have 21 days from the date the supplemental brief is served to file and serve any fast track answering brief that addresses the issues raised in appellant's fast track opening brief and supplemental brief. NRAP 3E(e)(1). fn1[ In light of this order, respondent's motion to extend time to file the fast track answering brief is denied as moot.] Nos. 90510/90909 (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more