Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-13
Status ACTIVE
Type Civil Appl To Dca/supreme
Docket 35 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Security National Insurance Co
Defendant Mitchell, Jerri L|Smith, Mark P
Photo of Hon. Estrada Peter

Judge

Hon. Estrada Peter

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Case 282024AP000045APAXMX Filed with Clerk on 9/13/2024
  2. ORDER GRANTING SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL
  3. Payment received. Receipt Number: MX 303008
  4. Assessment 2 Total Assessed $616.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  5. Assessment 2 assessed at sum $616.00
  6. INDEX AND STATEMENT MAILED TO ATTORNEYS
  7. MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL
  8. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE INITIAL BRIEF SHALL BE SERVED ON OR BEFORE 02/03/25.
  9. APPEAL PACKAGE
  10. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: FILING FEE DUE-MARK SMITH
  11. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: FILING FEE DUE-JERRI MITCHELL
  12. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM (MAGGIE LARA CROSS APPEAL)
  13. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM (MITCHELL CROSS APPEAL)
  14. NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL (MAGGIE LARA)
  15. NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL (JERRI MITCHELL)
  16. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: APPELLANT'S MOTION TO AMEND NOTICE OF APPEAL IS GRANTED, AND THE AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL IS ACCEPTED.
  17. MOTION TO AMEND NOTICE OF APPEAL
  18. AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED
  19. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE IS RELIEVED OF FURTHER APPELLATE RESPONSIBILITES. ATTY ALTENBERND SHALL REMAIN AS COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT.
  20. INDEX AND STATEMENT MAILED TO ATTORNEYS
  21. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: INSTANT APPEAL NOT APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION. STANDARD TIME PERIODS FOR APPEALS SHALL COMMENCE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.
  22. NOTICE OF LIMITED REPRESENTATION
  23. Payment received. Receipt Number: MX 295543
  24. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $100.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  25. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: CASE BEING REVIEWED TO DETERMINE APPELLATE MEDIATION. RECORD PREPARTION TIME WILL NOT BEGIN TO RUN UNTIL ORDERED BY COURT.
  26. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: CASE IS NOW UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR MEDIATION.
  27. Agency Case Number modified: 6D 24-2035
  28. DIRECTIONS TO THE CLERK
  29. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: $300 FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 20 DAYS
  30. ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM DISTRICT COURT (6D 24-2035)
  31. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
  32. Judge: ESTRADA , PETER FRANK Assigned
  33. State Attorney Case Number modified: GC 21-431
  34. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  35. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more