Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-15
Status ACTIVE
Type Crim Appeal Circuit To District
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Dixon, Ezzard Charles
Defendant State Of Florida
Photo of Hon. Estrada Peter

Judge

Hon. Estrada Peter

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case 282024AP000036APAXMX Filed with Clerk on 8/15/2024
  2. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER : THE MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL IS GRANTED. ATTORNEY MARSHALL IS SUBSTITUTED AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR APPELLANT. THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS RELIEVED OF FURTHER APPELLATE REPONSIBILITIES EXPCEPT THAT WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER ( 6D2024-1843 )
  3. SUPPLEMENTAL APPEAL PACKAGE
  4. SUPPLEMENTAL APPEAL RECORD (6D 24-1843) SENT TO APPEALS COURT 6DCA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE PUBLIC DEFENDER
  5. SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGNATIONS TO COURT REPORTER WAS EMAILED TO ECR
  6. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IS GRANTED (6D 24-1843)
  7. AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGNATIONS TO COURT REPORTER
  8. SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGNATIONS TO COURT REPORTER
  9. SUPPLEMENTAL DIRECTIONS TO CLERK
  10. APPEAL PACKAGE-UNREDACTED
  11. APPEAL PACKAGE-REDACTED
  12. APPEAL RECORD (6D 24-1843) SENT TO APPEALS COURT THE 6DCA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE PUBLIC DEFENDER
  13. Agency Case Number modified: 6D 24-1843
  14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM DISTRICT COURT (6D 24-1843)
  15. NOTICE OF APPEAL PLEADINGS SENT TO 6DCA, ATTY GENERAL, PUBLIC DEFENDER, AND ECR
  16. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
  17. Appellant Attorney: HOWARD L DIMMIG Assigned to FACC.CLERICUS.Identity.NamesBAO
  18. ORDER APPT COUNSEL/APPEAL (PD)
  19. DIRECTIONS TO THE CLERK
  20. Appellee Attorney: ASHLEY MOODY Assigned to FACC.CLERICUS.Identity.NamesBAO
  21. DESIGNATION TO COURT REPORTER
  22. STATEMENT OF JUDICIAL ACTS TO BE REVIEWED
  23. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  24. Judge: ESTRADA , PETER FRANK Assigned
  25. State Attorney Case Number modified: CF 22-885
  26. Prosecutor: ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY Assigned
  27. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more