Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-18
Status ACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 23 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant David J Condrut
Photo of Hon. Jeffrey P Saffold

Judge

Hon. Jeffrey P Saffold

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 08/05/2025 AT 10:30 AM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: JEFFREY P SAFFOLD (384) REASON: FAILURE OF SERVICE (notice sent).
  3. MC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 06/23/2025 AT 08:45 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 08/05/2025 AT 10:30 AM. PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 4(E), FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO SERVE THE DEFENDANT BY 09/18/2025 WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. CMC BY PHONE RESET. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 716-427-1108 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 130004# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 06/23/2025 AT 08:45 AM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: JEFFREY P SAFFOLD (384) REASON: FAILURE OF SERVICE (notice sent).
  5. ERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 56428070 ADDRESSED TO DAVID J CONDRUT(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  6. MC BY PHONE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 05/19/2025 AT 11:00 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 06/23/2025 AT 08:45 AM. PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 4(E), FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO SERVE THE DEFENDANT BY 09/18/2025 WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. CMC BY PHONE RESET. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 716-427-1108 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 130004# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. MC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 05/19/2025 AT 11:00 AM IS CANCELLED. JUDGE: JEFFREY P SAFFOLD (384) REASON: FAILURE OF SERVICE (notice sent).
  8. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR CONDRUT/DAVID/J 04/22/2025 17:02:09
  9. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR WINTERS/SEAN/M. 04/22/2025 17:02:09
  10. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR VELAYUDHAN/KRIS/K 04/22/2025 17:02:09
  11. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR MULLEN/DAVID/ 04/22/2025 17:02:09
  12. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 05/19/2025 AT 11:00 AM. ALL PARTIES COUNSELS ARE TO CALL THE CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 716-427-1108 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 130004# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR FOR THIS CMC WILL RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE, TIME AND CONFERENCE CALL DIRECTIONS. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. PRIOR TO THE CMC, PARTIES MUST EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(B)(3) AND DRAFT A PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(F). COUNSEL SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT THE PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE CMC. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO CONFER, PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE WITH THE COURT OF EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED.
  13. UMS COMPLAINT(56428070) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DAVID J CONDRUT 16134 BOWFIN BLVD BROOKPARK, OH 44142
  14. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  15. RIT FEE
  16. UDGE JEFFREY P SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  17. EGAL RESEARCH
  18. EGAL NEWS
  19. EGAL AID
  20. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  21. OMPUTER FEE
  22. LERK'S FEE
  23. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more