Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Clark Court

Court

Clark Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-09-05
Type Negligence Auto
Docket 25 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Williams, Teanna
Defendant Mygrant Glass Company, Inc.|Timoteo, Tuese Jarnegan
Photo of Hon.  Israel, Ronald J.

Judge

Hon.  Israel, Ronald J.

Clark County (NV)

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Jury Trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Israel, Ronald J.)
  2. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 2 [2] Summons - Mygrant Glass
  3. Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending Doc ID# 3 [3] Summons - Timoteo
  4. Affidavit of Service Doc ID# 4 [4] Affidavit of Service - Tuese Jarnegan Timoteo
  5. Amended Affidavit of Service Doc ID# 5 [5] Amended for Clerical Error Affidavit of Service - Timoteo
  6. Acceptance of Service Doc ID# 6 [6] Acceptance of Service
  7. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Doc ID# 7 [7] Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
  8. Answer Doc ID# 8 [8] Answer
  9. Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Doc ID# 9 [9] Order to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
  10. Request for Exemption From Arbitration Doc ID# 10 [10] Petition for Exemption from Arbitration
  11. Answer to Complaint Doc ID# 11 [11] Defendant Mygrant Glass Company, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint
  12. Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure Doc ID# 12 [12] Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
  13. Demand for Jury Trial Doc ID# 13 [13] Demand for Jury Trial
  14. Disclosure Statement Doc ID# 14 [14] Defendant Mygrant Glass, Inc.'s NRCP 7.1 Disclosure Statement
  15. Commissioners Decision on Request for Exemption - Granted Doc ID# 15 [15] Commissioner's Decision on Request for Exemption - GRANTED
  16. Notice of Appearance Doc ID# 16 [16] NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  17. Joint Case Conference Report Doc ID# 17 [17] Joint Case Conference Report
  18. Mandatory Rule 16 Conference Order Doc ID# 18 [18] Order To Appear For Mandatory Discovery Conference
  19. Notice Doc ID# 19 [19] Plaintiff's Notice of Compliance with 16.1 Disclosures
  20. Audiovisual Transmission Equipment Appearance Request Doc ID# 20 [20] Notice of Intent to Appear Via Simultaneous Audiovisual Transmission Equipment
  21. Notice of Compliance Doc ID# 21 [21] Notice of Compliance of Initial Disclosures
  22. Audiovisual Transmission Equipment Appearance Request Doc ID# 22 [22] NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY SIMULTANEOUS AUDIOVISUAL TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT
  23. Mandatory Rule 16 Conference (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Israel, Ronald J.) Parties Present Minutes Result: Matter Heard
  24. Scheduling and Trial Order Doc ID# 23 [23] Scheduling Order and Order Setting Civil Jury Trial
  25. Pretrial/Calendar Call (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Israel, Ronald J.)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more