Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- ertif Copies/Leg File Prepard Certified Copies mailed to Petitioner and Respondent
- udge/Clerk - Note NO TAX
- ertif Copies/Leg File Prepard Certified Copies and Stipulations Prepared
- eparation Agreement Filed SEPARATION AGREEMENT, PARENTING PLAN PART A&B, FORM 14
- udgment on Dissolution JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE GRANTED. BOTH PARTIES APPEAR IN PERSON. THERE ARE (2) UNEMANCIPATED CHILDREN BORN/ADOPTED OF THE MARRIAGE: THE PARTIES WILL SHARE JOINT LEGAL AND JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY USING PETITIONER'S ADDRESS FOR MAILING AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES: RESPONDENT WILL PAY PETITIONER THE SUM OF $500/MNTH AS AND FOR CHILD SUPPORT FOR (2) CHILDREN: $500/MNTH FOR (1): FORM 14 ATTACHED: THE COURT ORDERS & APPROVES THE PROVISIONS OF PART A&B OF THE PARENTING PLAN PERTAINING TO THE CUSTODIAL/SUPPORT ARRANGEMENTS OF THE MINOR CHILDREN AND INCORPORATES ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH. NO MAINTENANCE TO BE PAID BY EITHER PARTY. THE PARTIES HAVE ENTERED INTO A SEPARATION AGREEMENT MARKED EXH(2) WHICH IS FOUND TO BE NOT UNCONSCIONABLE AND MADE A PART OF THIS JUDGMENT; THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO PERFORM THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH: COURT COSTS TO BE PAID FROM THE COSTS DEPOSITED. PARTIES WAIVE REHEARING; A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS JUDGMENT WILL BE MAILED TO BOTH PARTIES. SO ORDERED: COMM. VICTORIA MCKEE ADOPTED AND APPROVED: JUDGE VIRGINIA LAY
- onsent Judgment Associated Entries: 08/02/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 08/02/2022 - Non Contested Hrng Sched + Scheduled For: 08/08/2022; 10:30 AM; VICTORIA MULLEN MCKEE; St Louis County
- ound Recording Log Sheet ALL PARTIES APPEARED IN PERSON START: 11:43:51AM FINISH: 11:59:09AM
- rder for Interpreter MOTION FOR ORDER TO APPOINT INTERPRETER APPROVED. SO ORDERED: COMM MCKEE
- on Contested Hrng Sched INTERPRETER ORDERED. Associated Entries: 08/09/2022 - Consent Judgment Scheduled For: 08/08/2022; 10:30 AM; VICTORIA MULLEN MCKEE; St Louis County
- earing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 06/28/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 06/28/2022 - Non Contested Hrng Sched + Associated Entries: 08/09/2022 - Consent Judgment Hearing Continued From: 08/02/2022; 10:00 AM Non Contested Hrng Sched
- on Contested Hrng Sched CC-HANDED TO BOTH PARTIES. Associated Entries: 08/02/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Scheduled For: 08/02/2022; 10:00 AM; VICTORIA MULLEN MCKEE; St Louis County
- earing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 05/25/2022 - Non Contested Hrng Sched Associated Entries: 08/02/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Hearing Continued From: 06/28/2022; 10:30 AM Non Contested Hrng Sched
- otion/Request for Interpreter MOTION FOR ORDER TO APPOINT INTERPRETER Filed By: CINDY T GARCIA
- on Contested Hrng Sched Associated Entries: 06/28/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Scheduled For: 06/28/2022; 10:30 AM; VICTORIA MULLEN MCKEE; St Louis County
- otice of Hearing Filed
- ert of Attendance Filed
- ertificate of Dissolution
- onfid Dom Rel Info File Sheet
- ert of Attendance Filed
- udge/Clerk - Note Automatic Family Court Order Rule 68.3, Mandatory Exchange of Documents Rule 68.5, and Mediation Rule 68.14 given TO RESPONDENT.
- udge/Clerk - Note Automatic Family Court Order Rule 68.3, Mandatory Exchange of Documents Rule 68.5, and Mediation Rule 68.14 given TO PETITIONER.
- eceipt Filed
- roposed Parenting Plan Filed SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES
- nswer Filed Filed By: MARIO CASTILLO RAMIREZ
- roperty Statement Filed SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES
- ncome & Expense Stmnt Filed Filed By: CINDY T GARCIA
- omp-Litigant Awareness Filed Filed By: CINDY T GARCIA
- iling:
- issolution Filed Family
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In