Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- nitial Judicial Assignment: Honorable Kristen Stohler
- uperior Court Complaint Receipt: 2181289 Date: 04/22/2024
- ummons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
- ttorney Information Attorney Dooling, Erin Elizabeth representing Plaintiff Matanuska-Susitna Borough as of 04/22/2024
- otice of Motion (Civil Rule 5(g)) Erin Elizabeth Dooling (Attorney) on behalf of Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff)
- atanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Writ of Assistance Attorney: Dooling, Erin Elizabeth (2401003) Filing Party: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #1
- otion for Expedited Consideration of: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for a Writ of Assistance Attorney: Dooling, Erin Elizabeth (2401003) Filing Party: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Case Motion #2
- rder Granting Motion for Expedited Consideration of: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for a Writ of Assistance Case Motion #2 Motion for Expedited Consideration of: Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for a Writ of Assistance
- rder Granting Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Writ of Assistance Case Motion #1 Matanuska-Susitna Borough's Motion for Writ of Assistance
- atanuska-Susitna Borough's Notice of Lack of Compliance (PPK only) Erin Elizabeth Dooling (Attorney) on behalf of Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff)
- eace Officer's Return of Writ Unserved (PPK only)
- atanuska-Susitna Borough's Notice of Rule 4(f) Proof of Service (PPK only) Return of Service - Summons Served On: 4/23/24 Grayden James (Defendant);
- otice of Dismissal (Dismissed Per CR41) Dismissed by Plaintiff Erin Elizabeth Dooling (Attorney) on behalf of Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Plaintiff)
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In