Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-28
Type Partition
Docket 39 entries
Disposition consolidated

Parties

Plaintiff Rositer, Julie
Defendant King, Constance
Photo of Hon. CHRISTINE CROCE

Judge

Hon. CHRISTINE CROCE

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MAGISTRATE'S ORDER. A SECOND MEDIATION WITH THE OBR IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 31, 2025 AT 1:30 P.M. SEE ORDER FRO ZOOM LINK. MAGISTRATE WILLIAM E. RININGER
  2. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS' SECOND SET OF CONSOLIDATED DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO DEFENDANTS CONSTANCE KING, ERIC KING, AND AARON KING
  3. MAGISTRATE'S ORDER. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED ONLY INSOFAR AS THEY REQUEST THAT ATTORNEY MEEKER BE PERMITTED TO ATTEND THE MEDIATION REMOTELY. MAGISTRATE WILLIAM E. RININGER
  4. MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO TELEPHONE/VIDEO MEDIATION
  5. MOTION TO ATTEND MEDIATION VIA TELEPHONE OR ZOOM
  6. PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
  7. MAGISTRATE'S ORDER. THIS MATTER COMES BEFORE THE COURT UPON DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING'S MAY 6, 2025 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE MOTION IS GRANTED. THE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO DEFENDANT KING'S MOTION, SHALL BE DEEMED FILED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. MAGISTRATE WILLIAM E. RININGER
  8. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS' CONSOLIDATED DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO DEFENDANTS CONSTANCE KING, ERIC KING, AND AARON KING
  9. DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
  10. SUBPOENA US BANK
  11. MEDIATION WITH THE OBR IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 14, 2025 AT 1:00 P.M. IN-PERSON. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. MAGISTRATE WILLIAM E. RININGER
  12. ORDER FOR OFFICE OF BACKLOG REDUCTION. CC
  13. DEFENDANT IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AS SET FORTH HEREIN WITHIN 14 DAYS. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. CC
  14. DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING'S COUNTERCLAIM
  15. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE MOTION IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS ON OR BEFORE MARCH 3, 2025. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. CC
  16. DEFENDANTS' PRETRIAL STATEMENT
  17. DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE BRIEF
  18. MOTION TO ATTEND PRETRIAL VIA TELEPHONE OR ZOOM
  19. PRETRIAL STATEMENT
  20. PLAINTIFF'S 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING'S COUNTERCLAIM
  21. DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  22. A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED ON FEBRUARY 20, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M. THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE CONDUCTED IN PERSON. NO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE CONDUCTED BY TELEPHONE UNLESS A MOTION SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE REQUEST IS FILED AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND THEREAFTER GRANTED BY THE COURT. SEE THIS ORDER FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION. CC
  23. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT UPON THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS CONSTANCE KING, ERIC KING AND AARON KING, SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE THEIR ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM. THE ORDER ISSUED HEREIN ON JANUARY 3, 2025 IS VACATED. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, THE MOTION IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE THEIR ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM. CC
  24. AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PARTITION OF REAL PROPERTY
  25. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 3, 2025
  26. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM FILED
  27. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF CONSTANCE KING
  28. DEFENDANTS, CONSTANCE KING, ERIC KING AND AARON KING INDICATED THEIR LEAVE TO PLEAD BY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 23, 2024. THE DOCKET INDICATED THAT SERVICE WAS COMPLETED UPON DEFENDANTS MORE THAN 28 DAYS PRIOR TO THIS ORDER. DEFENDANT HAVE NOT ANSWERED OR OTHERWISE RESPONDED TO THE COMPLAINT. IF A MOTION FOR DEFAULT IS NOT FILED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. CC
  29. FedEx Service - Served ERIC D. KING
  30. FedEx Service - Served CONSTANCE KING
  31. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY ROBERT C. MEEKER AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CONSTANCE KING, ERICE KING, AND AARON KING
  32. LEAVE TO PLEAD WITH CERTIFICATION
  33. FedEx Service - Served AARON D. KING
  34. SUMMONS ISSUED BY FEDEX KING, ERIC D.
  35. SUMMONS ISSUED BY FEDEX KING, CONSTANCE
  36. SUMMONS ISSUED BY FEDEX KING, AARON D.
  37. CERTIFICATE OF READINESS.
  38. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED
  39. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more