Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-10
Status Open
Type Actions Involving Business Entities And Government
Docket 37 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.
Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Event Result:: Conference to Review Status scheduled on: 12/10/2025 02:00 PM Has been: Canceled For the following reason: Case Settled Hon. Debra A Squires-Lee, Presiding Staff: Erin Coronado, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  2. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  3. Plaintiff Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.'s Statement of corporate disclosure
  4. Plaintiff Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.'s Motion to appt spec process server
  5. Notice of 93A complaint sent to Attorney General
  6. General correspondence regarding Notice of Acceptance into Business Litigation Session Accepted into BLS2 (Dated 12/11/2024) Notice sent 12/11/2024
  7. Endorsement on Motion for appt spec process server (#4.0): ALLOWED By the Court. (dated 12/12/2024)
  8. Service Returned for Applies To: The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Defendant)
  9. Plaintiff, Defendant Joseph Freedman Co., Inc., The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Stipulation for Enlargement of Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint
  10. Attorney appearance On this date Seth V Jackson, Esq. added for Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
  11. Attorney appearance On this date Kyle R Espinola, Esq. added for Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
  12. Party(s) file Stipulation for Enlarge of Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.'s Time to File Response to the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit Applies To: Joseph Freedman Co., Inc. (Plaintiff); The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Defendant)
  13. Plaintiff, Defendant Joseph Freedman Co., Inc., The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Stipulation for Further Enlargement of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit
  14. Endorsement on Stipulation for Further Enlargement of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit (#9.0): Other action taken Approved. (dated 2/13/25) Notice Sent 2/21/25
  15. Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit and Compel Proceeding with Pending Reference Under M.G.L . c, 175, 99
  16. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit and Compel Proceeding with Pending Reference Under M.G.L . c, 175, 99
  17. Affidavit in Support of Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit and Compel Proceeding with Pending Reference Under M.G.L . c, 175, 99 Applies To: The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Defendant)
  18. Exhibits/Appendix
  19. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay filed by Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.
  20. Plaintiff Joseph Freedman Co., Inc.'s Declaration in Support Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay, and Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice
  21. Exhibits/Appendix
  22. Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit and Compel Proceeding with Pending Reference Under M.G.L. c. 175 99
  23. Affidavit of Compliance with Rule 9A Applies To: The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Defendant)
  24. Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Request for Hearing
  25. Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Notice of Filing
  26. List of Documents Filed Applies To: The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Defendant)
  27. Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Certificate of Service
  28. Matter taken under advisement: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 07/10/2025 02:00 PM Has been: Held - Under advisement Hon. Debra A Squires-Lee, Presiding Staff: Erin Coronado, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  29. Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Notice of Filing pursuant to the court's request
  30. Supplemental Affidavit of Seth Jackson in support of Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Motion to dismiss and/or stay Lawsuit and compel proceeding with pending reference under M.G.L. c. 175 (ss) 99
  31. Exhibits/Appendix 25-27
  32. Endorsement on Motion to dismiss and/or stay lawsuit and compel proceeding with pending reference under M.G.L. c. 175, 99 (#10.0): ALLOWED Allowed-in-part. Case stayed, Reference compelled. See memo of Decision and Order of today's date. (dated 7/24/25)
  33. MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Memorandum of Decision and Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or Stay Lawsuit and Compel Proceeding with Pending Reference Under M.G.L. c. 175, 99 Defendant The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Motion is ALLOWED as to the request to stay lawsuit and compel the reference proceeding and DENIED as to the request for dismissal. this action shall be stayed pending completion of the reference proceeding. the panel of referees shall determine awards as to both the replacement value and the repair value of the loss at issue (including all building and equipment damages, lost business income, and extra expenses), unless the Parties otherwise stipulate to any such amount(s). See paper #23 (Dated 7/24/25) (Notice emailed 7/25/25) Judge: Squires-Lee, Hon. Debra A
  34. Plaintiff, Defendant Joseph Freedman Co., Inc., The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company's Joint Motion to Cancel November 4, 2025 Status Conference in Light of Settlement in Principle
  35. Event Result:: Conference to Review Status scheduled on: 11/04/2025 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: Joint request of parties Hon. Debra A Squires-Lee, Presiding Staff: Erin Coronado, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  36. Endorsement on Motion to Cancel November 4, 2025 Status Conference in Light of Settlement in Principle (#24.0): ALLOWED Allowed. Clerk to reschedule mid December. (dated 11/4/25) Notice sent by email
  37. Party(s) file Stipulation of Dismissal (E-filed 11/18/25) as to plff vs deft with prejudice with each party bearing their own costs and fees and with all rights of appeal waived JUDGMENT Entered on docket pursuant to Mass R Civ P 58(a) as amended and notice sent to parties pursuant to Mass R Civ P 77(d) Applies To: Joseph Freedman Co., Inc. (Plaintiff); The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Defendant)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more