Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-30
Type Miscellaneous
Docket 28 entries
Disposition affirmed

Docket Entries

  1. pinion Certified Serve: Barrow, Frances Serve: Friedman, Shaw Serve: Noel, Jeremy Serve: Rokita, Theodore Notice Date: 03/24/2025
  2. ocument Transmitted
  3. pinion Issued Memorandum Decision MEMORANDUM DECISION Foley, J., affirmed Bailey, J. and Bradford, J., concur Judicial Officer: Foley, Peter R. Serve: Barrow, Frances Serve: Friedman, Shaw Serve: Noel, Jeremy Serve: Rokita, Theodore File Stamp: 01/28/2025
  4. ocument Transmitted
  5. otice of Additional Authority Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/23/25 Attorney: Friedman, Shaw Attorney: Noel, Jeremy Party: Payne, George File Stamp: 01/23/2025
  6. lectronic Documents Received from Trial Court Clerk Volumes of Transcripts - One (1) Volumes of Exhibits - One (1) Volumes of T/C - One (1) Disk Received By-Mailed 12/2/2024 Postmark: 11/22/2024
  7. ase Fully Briefed Oral Argument Requested: No FB Date: 12/11/2024
  8. ransmitted to Court of Appeals
  9. rief - Appellant Reply Brief - Appellant Reply Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 11/21/24 Attorney: Friedman, Shaw Attorney: Noel, Jeremy Party: Payne, George File Stamp: 11/21/2024
  10. rial Court Clerk Notified to Transmit Transcript Date Sent: 11/22/2024
  11. ocument Transmitted
  12. rief - Appellee Brief - Appellee Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 11/08/24 Attorney: Barrow, Frances Party: Indiana Department of Corrections Party: State of Indiana Employees' Appeals Commission File Stamp: 11/08/2024
  13. ppearance by Deputy AG Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 10/17/2024 DAG: Barrow, Frances Party: Indiana Department of Corrections File Stamp: 10/17/2024
  14. rief and Appendix - Appellant Brief - Appellant Brief - Appealed Order Volumes of Appendix: Two (2) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 10/09/24 Attorney: Friedman, Shaw Attorney: Noel, Jeremy Party: Payne, George File Stamp: 10/09/2024
  15. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Appellant's Brief and Appendix Party: Payne, George Serve: Friedman, Shaw Serve: Noel, Jeremy Serve: Rokita, Theodore File Stamp: 10/09/2024
  16. ocument Transmitted
  17. eceived Document Receive Date: 10/07/24 Appellant's Brief and Appendix - Appendix has two Certificates of Service with conflicting information. Volume I states service on Brief, Volume II correctly states service of the Appendix. Per A.R. 46(A)(12) Order/judgment being appealed is to be a separate attachment to the brief, not at the conclusion of the Brief. PostmarkDate: 10/07/2024
  18. otice of Defect Not Cured Letter Issued Clerk Comments: Appellant's Brief and Appendix - Appendix has two Certificates of Service with conflicting information. Volume I states service on Brief, Volume II correctly states service of the Appendix. Per A.R. 46(A)(12) Order/judgment being appealed is to be a separate attachment to the brief, not at the conclusion of the Brief. Party: Payne, George Serve: Friedman, Shaw Serve: Noel, Jeremy Serve: Rokita, Theodore Issue Date: 10/08/2024
  19. ocument Transmitted
  20. otice of Defect Issued Appellant's Brief and Appendix Party: Payne, George Serve: Friedman, Shaw Serve: Noel, Jeremy Serve: Rokita, Theodore Issue Date: 10/07/2024
  21. ocument Transmitted
  22. eceived Document Receive Date: 10/04/24 Appellant's Brief and Appendix - 1)Brief lacks separate attachment of order/judgment being appealed, 2) Brief and Volume II of Appendix are mispaginated. Each documents first page should be numbered 1 then numbered consecutively, 3) Certificate of Brief does not correctly identify the document being served, 4) Appendix lacks a Certificate of Service. PostmarkDate: 10/04/2024
  23. eceived Court Reporter's Notice of Filing of Transcript Received on: 09/16/24 PostmarkDate: 09/11/2024
  24. otice of Completion of Transcript Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 09/05/24 File Stamp: 09/05/2024
  25. otice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Yet Completed Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 08/01/24 File Stamp: 08/01/2024
  26. otice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 07/30/24 Attorney: Friedman, Shaw Attorney: Noel, Jeremy Party: Payne, George File Stamp: 07/30/2024
  27. OA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 08/01/2024
  28. ocument Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more