Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-14
Type Cc Adult Abuse W/o Stalking
Docket 39 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Defendant Darner, Phillip James
Photo of Hon. Foulke Robert John

Judge

Hon. Foulke Robert John

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  2. eturned Mail-Undeliverable Notice of Hearing and Judgment of the Full Order of Protection mailed to Respondent by Certified Mail returned to the Barry County Circuit Clerks' office with no indication on reason for return. The Domestic Receipt was not attached to the back of the envelope.
  4. FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  5. eceipt Filed EMAIL RECEIPT
  6. iling: EMAIL CONFIRMATIONS
  7. otice NOTICE OF ENTRY AND COPY OF JUDGMENT MAILED TO PETITIONER. NOTICE OF ENTRY, CASE PARTY FEE REPORT, AND COPY OF JUDGMENT SENT TO RESPONDENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL (7014 0510 0001 4347 2140). NOTICE OF ENTRY AND COPY OF JUDGMENT EMAILED TO EX PARTE GROUP. -SP
  8. dult Abuse Costs Taxed PAYMENT PLAN #108632
  9. FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  10. udmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 12-JUN-2026; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - WHEREVER THE PETITIONER MAY RESIDE, BE EMPLOYED OR BE LOCATED AT; Additional Orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - PETITIONER IS GRANTED EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION OF THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S/THE PARTIES' RESIDENCE. RESPONDENT SHALL IMMEDIATELY VACATE AND/OR SHALL NOT ENTER UPON THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S/THE PARTIES' RESIDENCE. FURTHER RESPONDENT SHALL NOT KNOWINGLY ENTER UPON THE PREMISES OF ANY FUTURE RESIDENCE OF PETITIONER. RESPONDENT IS FORBIDDEN TO ENTER OR STAY AT PETITIONER'S RESIDENCE. THIS COURT FINDS THAT IN ORDER TO ENSURE PETITIONER'S SAFETY, RESPONDENT SHALL NOT ENTER ONTO THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S SCHOOL, ENTER ONTO THE PREMISES OF PETITIONER'S PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT, COME WITHIN 100 FEET OF PETITIONER.
  11. ull Order of Protection
  12. efault Judgment CAUSE CALLED. PETITIONER APPEARS IN PERSON. HEARING HELD ON THE RECORD. BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, COURT FINDS THAT PETITIONER HAS MET PETITIONER'S BURDEN OF PROOF AND IS ENTITLED TO THE RELIEF AS PRAYED. FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION ENTERED AS SIGNED AND FILED HEREIN. SO ORDERED ON THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025. ROBERT FOULKE, JUDGE. Associated Entries: 05/27/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Associated Entries: 05/27/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 06/13/2025; 10:30 AM; ROBERT JOHN FOULKE; Barry
  13. ound Recording Log Sheet
  14. otice of Service return exparte. Document ID - 25-AEOP-172
  15. rd of Protection Served Document ID - 25-AEOP-172; Served To - DARNER, PHILLIP JAMES; Server - SO BARRY COUNTY-CASSVILLE; Served Date - 29-MAY-25; Served Time - 20:05:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served; Service Text - DELIVERING A COPY OF THE ORDER AND THE PETITION TO PHILLIP DARNER
  16. EXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order modifications was submitted for electronic processing
  17. ched Hrng Submt Electronicaly SCAA Submitted Electronically and associates it to SCAA - Adult Abuse Hearing scheduled
  18. roposed Order Filed PROPOSED FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION
  19. eceipt Filed EMAIL RECEIPT
  20. iling: EMAIL CONFIRMATIONS
  21. EXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order modifications was submitted for electronic processing
  22. otice of Court Hearing Sent NOTICE OF HEARING MAILED TO PETITIONER. EMAILED TO EX PARTE GROUP. -SP
  23. ched Hrng Submt Electronicaly SCAA Submitted Electronically and associates it to SCAA - Adult Abuse Hearing scheduled
  24. xParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - WHEREVER PETITIONER MAY RESIDE, BE EMPLOYED OR BE LOCATED AT; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Resp not to abuse pet(s) - YES
  25. x Parte Order Issued Document ID: 25-AEOP-172, for DARNER, PHILLIP JAMES. ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED. EMAILED TO BCSO FOR SERVICE ON RESPONDENT. EMAILED TO EX PARTE GROUP.
  26. dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 06/13/2025 - Default Judgment + Scheduled For: 06/13/2025; 10:30 AM; ROBERT JOHN FOULKE; Barry
  27. earing Continued/Rescheduled Petitioners appear. Ex parte remains in full force and effect. Hearing set for 6/13/25 at 10:30 a.m, Alias summons to issue. so ordered Robert Foulke Associated Entries: 05/14/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 06/13/2025 - Default Judgment + Hearing Continued From: 05/27/2025; 8:30 AM Adult Abuse Hearing
  28. otice of Service return exparte. Document ID - 25-AEOP-159
  29. rd of Prot Returned Non-Est Document ID - 25-AEOP-159; Served To - DARNER, PHILLIP JAMES; Server - SO BARRY COUNTY-CASSVILLE; Served Date - 23-MAY-25; Served Time - 09:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Non-est; Service Text - NON EST - UNABLE TO MAKE CONTACT
  30. eceipt Filed EMAIL RECEIPTS
  31. iling: EMAIL CONFIRMATIONS
  32. EXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order was submitted for electronic processing
  33. roposed Order Filed PROPOSED JUDGMENT OF THE FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION - ADULT
  34. xParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - WHEREVER PETITIONER MAY RESIDE, BE EMPPLOYED, OR BE LOCATE AT.; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Resp not to abuse pet(s) - YES
  35. x Parte Order Issued Document ID: 25-AEOP-159, for DARNER, PHILLIP JAMES. EMAILED TO BCSO FOR SERVICE ON RESPONDENT EMAILED TO EXPARTE GROUP 2 COPIES GIVEN TO PETITIONER AT WINDOW
  36. dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 05/27/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 05/27/2025; 8:30 AM; ROBERT JOHN FOULKE; Barry
  37. rder EXPARTE ORDER OF PROTECTION TO BE ISSUED BY THIS COURT. AN IMMEDIATE AND PRESENT DANGER OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TO THE PETITIONER WAS SHOWN IN THE PETITION. THE EXPARTE ORDER WILL TAKE EFFECT WHEN ENTERED AND WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL A HEARING ON THE FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION IS HELD. A HEARING ON THE PETITION SHALL BE HELD AS LISTED ON THE EXPARTE ORDER. SO ORDERED. ROBERT FOULKE - JUDGE Filed By: ROBERT JOHN FOULKE
  38. et for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - NEIGHBOR Filed By: Petitioner
  39. onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed Filed By: Petitioner

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more