Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-10
Type Miscellaneous
Docket 34 entries
Disposition appeal is dismissed

Docket Entries

  1. eceived Document Receive Date: 08/28/2024 Affidavit of Indigence; Brief and Appendix- Appellant **Filing fee not paid; lacks motion for pauper; lacks order from trial court regarding pauper on appeal; Appealed order appears to have been tendered within the brief rather than immediately following certificate of service; Appealed order must be tendered at the end of the document not before the certificate of service** PostmarkDate: 08/23/2024
  2. ocument Not Corrected Pursuant to Notice of Defect Issued Clerk Comments:Affidavit of Indigence; Brief and Appendix- Appellant **Filing fee not paid; lacks motion for pauper; lacks order from trial court regarding pauper on appeal; Appealed order appears to have been tendered within the brief rather than immediately following certificate of service; Appealed order must be tendered at the end of the document not before the certificate of service** Party: Morris, Douglas Serve: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore Date Sent: 09/09/2024
  3. ocument Transmitted
  4. rder Dismissing Appeal with Prejudice order dismissing appeal Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was an unauthorized successive petition for post-conviction relief. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Clerk of this Court is directed to send this order to the parties, the trial court, and the Scott Circuit and Superior Courts Clerk. 3. The Scott Circuit and Superior Courts Clerk is directed to file this order under Cause Number 72C01-2403-MI-14, and, pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 77(D), the Clerk shall place the contents of this order in the Record of Judgments and Orders. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore File Stamp: 09/03/2024
  5. ocument Transmitted
  6. eceived Document Receive Date: 08/21/2024 Affidavit of Indigence- Appellant **Lacks Motion for Pauper and Order from trial Court regarding pauper on appeal- Appellant PostmarkDate: 08/19/2024
  7. ocument Not Corrected Pursuant to Notice of Defect Issued Clerk Comments:Affidavit of Indigence- Appellant **Lacks Motion for Pauper and Order from trial Court regarding pauper on appeal- Appellant Party: Morris, Douglas Serve: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore Date Sent: 08/30/2024
  8. ocument Transmitted
  9. ocument Transmitted
  10. eceived Document Receive Date: 08/09/2024 Brief; Appendix; and letter- Appellant **Filing fee not paid: Brief lacks Appealed order; Letter appears to address pauper but does not provide documentation sufficient to establish compliance with appellate rule 40.** PostmarkDate: 08/07/2024
  11. otice of Defect Not Cured Letter Issued Clerk Comments:Brief; Appendix; and letter- Appellant **Filing fee not paid: Brief lacks Appealed order; Letter appears to address pauper but does not provide documentation sufficient to establish compliance with appellate rule 40.** Party: Morris, Douglas Serve: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore Issue Date: 08/19/2024
  12. ocket Sheet Transmitted for Dismissal Nothing Filed in Furtherance of this Appeal
  13. otice of Defect Issued Appendix- Appellant Party: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore Issue Date: 08/02/2024
  14. ocument Transmitted
  15. eceived Document Receive Date: 07/26/2024 Motion to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis- Appellant **Lacks affidavit in support of motion; lacks order from trial court regarding pauper status on appeal; tendered with partial CCS for a case not related to this cause number.** PostmarkDate: 07/25/2024
  16. otice of Defect Issued Motion to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis- Appellant Party: Morris, Douglas Serve: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore Issue Date: 08/02/2024
  17. ocument Transmitted
  18. eceived Document Receive Date: 07/25/2024 Brief and Appendix- Appellant **Brief lacks appealed order; appendix lacks verification of accuracy and certificate of service; filing fee has not been paid** PostmarkDate: 07/22/2024
  19. ocument Not Corrected Pursuant to Notice of Defect Issued Clerk Comments:Brief- Appellant **Filing fee not paid; lacks appealed order** Party: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore Date Sent: 08/01/2024
  20. ocument Transmitted
  21. etter Issued Party: Morris, Douglas Date Sent: 07/17/2024
  22. ocument Transmitted
  23. eceived Document Receive Date: 07/08/2024 Correspondence- Appellant PostmarkDate: 07/01/2024
  24. eceived Document Receive Date: 06/17/24 Correspondence from Appellant with address change PostmarkDate: 06/10/2024
  25. eceived Document Receive Date: 06/12/2024 Letter- Appellant PostmarkDate: 06/10/2024
  26. otice of Defect Issued Brief- Appellant Party: Morris, Douglas Serve: Morris, Douglas Serve: Rokita, Theodore Issue Date: 06/13/2024
  27. ocument Transmitted
  28. eceived Document Receive Date: 06/07/2024 Brief- Appellant **Filing fee not paid** PostmarkDate: 05/31/2024
  29. otice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Yet Completed Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 5/21/24 (Issue Date) File Stamp: 05/21/2024
  30. otice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service-Mailed 05/10/24 (prison mailbox rule; no service on opposing party identified) Attorney: Morris, Douglas Party: Morris, Douglas File Stamp: 05/10/2024
  31. OA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 05/20/2024
  32. iling Fee Not Paid/Rule 40 Compliance Missing
  33. otice Regarding Case Creation Party: Morris, Douglas Notice Sent: 05/20/2024
  34. ocument Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more