Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-08
Type Divorce
Docket 40 entries
Disposition SETTLEMENT
Photo of Hon. MISAK, TRISHA

Judge

Hon. MISAK, TRISHA

Cleveland County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  11. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. SUMMONS ISS'D
  16. SHF'S FEE
  17. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS
  18. PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR 43 O.S. 110 DOCUMENTATION
  19. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR ATTY'S FEES AND COSTS
  20. ORIG SUMMONS RET'D- SERVED JACOB HARRIS 12-8-23 GCSO
  21. SPECIAL APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
  22. S/O: MATTER IS SCHEDULED FOR T.O. HRG THIS DATE. MR. GLASS HAS ENTERED HIS APPEARANCE THIS DATE AND REQUESTS A CONTINUANCE. PETITIONER HAS NO OBJECTION SO LONG AS THE EMERGENCY PO IN PO-23-130 REMAINS IN EFFECT. T.O. HRG RESET TO 2/5/24 @ 10:00 AM. (TM)
  23. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  24. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
  25. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR 43 O.S. 110 DOCUMENTATION
  26. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS
  27. S/O: MATTER COMES ON FOR TEMP. ORDER HRG THIS DATE. PARTIES APPEAR WITH COUNSEL & ANNOUNCE THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENT. 1) TEMP. CUSTODY OF R.S.H., BORN IN NOVEMBER, 2020 TO PETITIONER. 2)RESPONDENT GRANTED TEMP. VISITATION EVERY TUES. & THURS. FOR A MINIMUM OF 2 HRS AND EVERY SAT. FOR A MINIMUM OF 4 HRS. SAME TO BE SUPERVISED BY RESPONDENT'S SISTER. 3) CHILD SUPPORT ORDERED PER GUIDELINES. PARTIES TO EXCHANGE PAY STUBS WITHIN 10 DAYS. PETITIONER SHALL MAINTAIN THE CHILD ON HER HEALTH INSURANCE. 4) EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER TO REMAIN IN EFFECT. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: A) SUBJECT TO THIS COURT'S INTERPRETATION, CHILDREN ARE NOT PETITIONERS IN PO PROCEEDS. B) PARTIES ALLOWED TO COMMUNICATE THROUGH RESPONDENT'S SISTER REGARDING THE MINOR CHILD. 5) RESPONDENT SHALL PROVIDE ALIST OF PERSONAL PROPERTY IN PETITIONER'S POSSESSION HE WOULD LIKE RET'D. PARTIES & COUNSEL WILL ARRANGE DAY & TIME FOR EXCHANGE. 6) EACH PARTY AWARDED TEMP. POSSESSION OF PROPERTY IN HIS/HER POSS'N. 7) EACH PARTY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEBTS ON PEROPERTY THEY ARE AWARDED AND ANY DEBTS ON HIS/HER NAME ONLY. PETITIONER TO PROVIDE NECESSARY INFO FOR RESPONDENT TO ACCESS ACCOUNTS HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. 8) PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ATTY FEES & COSTS IS RESERVED FOR FUTURE HRG. (TM)
  28. EARLY SETTLEMENT MEDIATION
  29. NOTICE OF HEARING
  30. S/O: MATTER COMES ON FOR HRG. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT HAS FILED A MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND IS ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW. MATTER CONT'D TO 1/3/25 @ 2:30 PM FOR STATUS CONFERENCE/PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. RESPONDENT TO APPEAR WITH AN ATTY OR BE PREPARED TO PROCEED AS HIS OWN ATTY. IT IS SO ORDERED. (TM)
  31. ORDER GRANITNG WITHDRAWAL
  32. MOTION TO WITHDRAW
  33. S/O: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE HELD THIS DATE. PETITIONER APPEARS WITH COUNSEL. RESPONDENT APPEARS PRO SE. COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER ADVISES HE INTENDS TO MAKE SOME DISCOVERY REQUESTS FROM RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT VERIFIES HIS CURRENT ADDRESS WHERE THOSE REQUESTS MAY BE SENT. PTC RESET TO 2/24/25 @ 3:00 PM. COURT WILL SCHEDULE TRIAL ON THE MERITS ONCE DISCOVERY IS COMPLETE. (TM)
  34. CSS'S ENTRY OF APPEARANCE & NOTICE OF NECESSARY PARTY
  35. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE- (TATE WISE FOR RESPONDENT)
  36. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  37. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE
  38. S/O: BY AGREEMENT OF PARTIES, PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE IS RESET TO 5/16/25 @ 2:30 PM. CLERK TO MAIL TO COUNSEL OF RECORD. (TM)
  39. S/O: COURT REPORTER REQUESTED AT THIS TIME. PTC CONDUCTED THIS DATE. COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER ADVISES THAT RESPONDENT HAS NOT YET COMPLIED WITH DISCOVERY. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT IS ADVISED THAT IF RESPONDENT DOES NOT OCMPLY WITH DISCOVERY REQUESTS BY 6/2/25, HE WILL BE PRECLUDED FROM PRESENTING EVIDENCE ON THE ISSUES RELATED TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS AT TRIAL, WHETHER THAT BE IN HIS CASE IN CHIEF OR THROUGH CROSS-EXAMINATION OF PETITIONER'S WITNESSES. PARTIES SHALL EXCHANGE WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS, ALONG WITH COPIES OF PREMARKES EXHBITITS, BY 6/23/25. HRG ON MERITS SET FOR 8/7/25 @ 11:00AM. PARTIES SHALL PROVIDE PROOF OF COMPLETION OF COPARENTING BY 7/1/25. (TM)
  40. CERTITICATE OF COMPLETING PARENTING CLASS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.