Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-16
Type Dissolution
Docket 30 entries
Disposition remov
Photo of Hon. Gatlin, S Brooke

Judge

Hon. Gatlin, S Brooke

Washita County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFF. 07/01/04
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  6. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND FEE (REMOVE FEE IF PRO SE)
  8. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  9. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  10. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK RECOLVING FUND
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. NOTE: REMOVE LTF IF PRO SE! REMOVE THIS NOTE!!
  14. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  15. AFFIDAVIT AS TO MILITARY SERVICE
  16. ISSUING NOTICE OF CONFERENCE
  17. ISSUING SUMMONS & NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
  18. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER AND RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY ORDERS
  19. RESPONSE AND COUNTERCLAIM
  20. DIEPC: PARTY COMPLETED DIVORCE IMPACT EDUCATIONAL PROG.
  21. NAME: JAMIE PHIPPS
  22. CM: JJ/PC CASE COMES ON FOR CONFERENCE. PETTITIONER APPEARS WITH RYAN MEACHAM. RESPONDENT APPEARS WITH SHANDELLE RECKER. PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PARTIES WILL CONTINUE ALTERNATING THE CHILD PURSUANT TO THIER CURRENT SCHEDULE (MOM - MONDAY&WEDSDAY) (DAD - TUESDAY&THURSDAY ALTERNATE WEEKENDS) 2. PARTIES WILL FILE A JOINT TAX RETURN AND SPLIT THE NET REFUND EQUALLY. 3. PARTIES WILL COMMUNICATE SOLELY VIA TEXT MESSAGE AND NO COMMUNICATIONS WILL BE ALTERED OR DELETED 5. PETITIONER WILL DETERMINE IF HE WILL BE ABLE TO REFINANCE THE MARITAL HOME. - PET TO MAIN - POSSESER OF HOME & SERVICE ULILITY FURTHER CONFERENCE SET APRIL 1, 2025, AT 8:30 AM
  23. DIEPC: PARTY COMPLETED DIVORCE IMPACT EDUCATIONAL PROG.
  24. NAME: DONOVAN PHIPPS
  25. CM: SCJ PETITIONER APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY RYAN MEACHAM. RESPONDENT APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY SHANDELLE RECKER. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, CONFERENCE IS CONTINUED TO JUNE 17, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M.
  26. CM: SCJ PETITIONER APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY RYAN MEACHAM. RESPONDENT APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY SHANDELLE RECKER. AT THE REQUEST OF THE PARTIES, COURT CONTINUES DIVORCE CONFERENCE TO AUGUST 5, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M.
  27. ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE - 8/19/25 AT 830AM
  28. ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM - DAVID MOSBURG EMAILED
  29. CM: SCJ PETITIONER APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY RYAN MEACHAM. RESPONDENT APPEARS WITH ATTORNEY SHANDELLE RECKER. BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, DIVORCE CONFERENCE IS HEREBY CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 7, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more