Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-09
Status Briefing in Progress
Type Civil Appeal General Proper Person
Docket 14 entries

Docket Entries

  1. ppeal Filing Fee Waived. In Forma Pauperis. (SC)
  2. iled Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)
  3. enior Justice Michael A. Cherry disqualified from participation in this matter. Disqualification Reason: Sat in District Court Proceedings
  4. ssued Notice Regarding Deadlines. Transcript request form due: 14 days; Docketing statement due: 21 days; Opening/Informal brief due: 120 days. (SC)
  5. ustice Linda Bell disqualified from participation in this matter. Disqualification Reason: Sat in District Court Proceedings
  6. iled District Court Documents. Added Sealed Order Granting in Forma Pauperis to Record on Appeal (SC)
  7. iled Emergency Motion for Stay Until District Court hears Fraud Upon Court Motion on 7/17/2025. (scheduled District Court hearing on July 17, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.)(SC)
  8. iled Proper Person Motion to Extend Time to file Docketing Statement. (DETACHED DOCKETING STATEMENT AND FILED SEPARATELY PER ORDER ON 7/11/25) (SC)
  9. iled Appellant's Motion for Time Extension to File Transcript Request Form(1st Request)(SC)
  10. iled Order Addressing Motions for Extensions of Time, Denying Emergency Motion for Stay, and Directing Transmission of Record. Having reviewed appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the docketing statement, the motion is granted. The clerk of this court shall detach and file the docketing statement provisionally provided with the July 9, 2025, motion. Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the transcript request form indicates that all transcripts have already been filed in the district court, except for the transcript of an anticipated July 17, 2025, hearing on his motion for reconsideration. As it appears that appellant thus is not seeking the preparation of any transcripts pertaining to the June 4 order on appeal, this court will treat the motion as including a certificate of no transcript request under NRAP 9(a)(2)(B), and the motion is granted insofar as it requests an extension of time to file this certificate, NRAP 26(b)(1)(A). As a result, appellant's NRAP 9 transcript requesting duties in this appeal have been satisfied. To the extent appellant seeks to include a transcript of the anticipated upcoming hearing, that request is denied, as the notice of appeal was properly filed on June 5, 2025, before the motion for reconsideration was filed on June 9, and district court proceedings that occur after a notice of appeal is filed generally are not properly included in the record on appeal. Further, with respect to appellant's emergency motion for stay, which seeks to hold this appeal in abeyance pending resolution of his motion for reconsideration below, the stay is denied. Finally, having reviewed the documents on file in this appeal, this court concludes that review of the complete record is warranted. NRAP 10(a)(1). Accordingly, within 30 days from the date of this order, the clerk of the district court shall transmit to the clerk of this court a certified copy of the trial court record in District Court Case No. A-20-819125-C. (SC)
  11. iled Appellant's Civil Docketing Statement. (SC)
  12. iled Proper Person Informal Opening Brief (Pro Se)
  13. iled Proper Person Motion to Consolidate and Submit one Combined Brief(SC)
  14. iled Record on Appeal DC # A-20-819125-C (Roger Allen Kenis vs. MGM Resorts International; et al.) Volumes 1-28 (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more