Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Minnesota Supreme Court

Court

Minnesota Supreme Court

Minnesota

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-09
Status Briefing
Type Standard Civil Paternity
Docket 22 entries

Docket Entries

  1. vent - Electronic Record Submitted/Received
  2. otice - Request Trial Court/Agency File
  3. rder - Grant-Appellant's amended motion to file two versions of the brief is granted and ordered filed.
  4. rief - Appellant (confidential) (ordered filed 7/25/25)
  5. rief - Appellant Redacted (orderd filed 7/25/25)
  6. otion - Leave to File Separate Confidential and Redacted Briefs
  7. otice - Attorney Appearance - Attorney Smith for Crow Wing County Community Services
  8. rder - Deny Motion to Seal and Motion to Accept a Late Appellant Brief. Appellant Shall Either File a Public Brief or File a Motion to Accept 2 Briefs by 7/25/25
  9. otion - Seal
  10. ejected - Brief/Addendum/Motion (Under Same Filing Type)
  11. otion - Accept Late Filings - Appellant's Brief
  12. rief - Appellant E-Filed - Rejected (No Addendum Uploaded)
  13. rder - Grant-Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is Granted, Due 7/14/25. GAL is removed as a Party to This Case.
  14. orrespondence - Incoming - Guardian ad Litem's Response to COA Order for Submission on Issues of Party Status
  15. otion - Extension of Time - Appellant's Brief
  16. rder - Counsel for the Guardian ad Litem Shall File Correspondence into the Case Letting the Courts Know if they are a Party to the Case by 6/20/25
  17. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Karen Skaj
  18. ejected - Delivery Certificate - CR Skaj (No Service on Counsel for GAL)
  19. otice - Attorney Appearance Atty Sonsalla o/b/o GAL
  20. ranscript - Initial Certificate-Karen Skaj
  21. otice - Case Filing
  22. tatement - Case - Appellant

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more