Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-11
Status ACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mri Software Llc
Defendant Electra Housing Authority
Photo of Hon. JOHN J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. JOHN J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. EPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM FILED P1 MRI SOFTWARE LLC, ATTORNEY CLINTON E. PRESLAN 0080748 REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFENDANT ELECTRA HOUSING AUTHORITY
  2. MC BY PHONE HELD ON 06/12/2025. ALL COUNSEL PRESENT. DISCOVERY CUT-OFF IS 10/01/2025. CASE TO BE REFERRED TO MEDIATION AT THE CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY. ANY EXPERT REPORTS OBTAINED SHALL BE EXCHANGED BY 10/30/25. DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO BE FILED BY 11/17/2025. OPPOSITION DUE ACCORDING TO CIV. R. 6. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 02/24/2026 AT 01:00 PM. COURTROOM 16-B. CLIENTS OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT. INFORMATION ON THE SETTLEMENT PROCESS THE COURT UTILIZES IS AVAILABLE ON JUDGE JOHN RUSSO'S WEB PAGE ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE AT HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-JOHN-J-RUSSO/. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 03/25/2026 AT 09:00 AM. COURTROOM 16-B. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIV.R. 6, THE COURT ORDERS THAT ANY MOTION IN LIMINE IS TO BE FILED AT LEAST 28 DAYS BEFORE THE TRIAL. ANY RESPONSE IS DUE 14 DAYS THEREAFTER. NO REPLY SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE COURT ADDITIONALLY ORDERS THAT 14 DAYS BEFORE THE TRIAL ALL PARTIES ARE TO FILE THE FOLLOWING: (1) TRIAL BRIEFS, (2) WITNESS LISTS, (3) EXHIBIT LISTS, (4) JURY INSTRUCTIONS, JURY INTERROGATORIES, AND/OR JURY VERDICT FORMS IF APPLICABLE, (5) STIPULATIONS, AND (6) AN AGREED UPON STATEMENT OF THE CASE TO BE READ TO THE JURY. WITH RESPECT TO JURY INSTRUCTIONS, JURY INTERROGATORIES, AND/OR JURY VERDICT FORMS, THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH ONE CONSOLIDATED SET OF INSTRUCTIONS/INTERROGATORIES/VERDICT FORMS THAT INCLUDES ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS/INTERROGATORIES/VERDICT FORMS TO WHICH THE PARTIES AGREE AND THAT IDENTIFIES ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS/INTERROGATORIES/VERDICT FORMS TO WHICH THE PARTIES DISAGREE. A COURTESY COPY OF THE PARTIES' CONSOLIDATED SET OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS, JURY INTERROGATORIES, AND/OR JURY VERDICT FORMS IN WORD FORMAT SHOULD BE EMAILED TO THE COURT'S STAFF ATTORNEY. ON THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE COURT ORDERS THAT THE PARTIES PREPARE EITHER A JOINT OR SEPARATE BINDER OF THE EXHIBITS AND PROVIDE COPIES FOR THE COURT, THE WITNESS STAND, AND OPPOSING COUNSEL. NOTICE ISSUED
  3. OTICE FILED BY P1 MRI SOFTWARE LLC ATTORNEY CLINTON E. PRESLAN 0080748 NOTICE OF FILING CERTIFICATE REGARDING JUDGE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
  4. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY D1 ELECTRA HOUSING AUTHORITY ATTORNEY JOHN P. ARCHER 0073721 CERTIFICATE REGARDING JUDGE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
  5. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOHN P. ARCHER
  6. NSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM $75 ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFENDANT ELECTRA HOUSING
  7. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR PRESLAN/CLINTON/E. 05/20/2025 17:01:56
  8. CHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR ARCHER/JOHN/P. 05/20/2025 17:01:56
  9. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 06/12/2025 AT 10:15 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE COURT S CONFERENCE NUMBER (605) 313-5579 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4539808# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND INTERROGATORIES MUST BE SERVED PRIOR TO THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THE PARTIES MUST ALSO FILE THIS COURT'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. THIS COURT'S TRIAL ORDER IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT JUDGE JOHN J. RUSSO'S WEBPAGE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE AT: HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-JOHN-J-RUSSO/
  10. OTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT 1 TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL
  11. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AGREEMENT UNDER SEAL, FILED 04/24/2025, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. TIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED STIPULATED LEAVE TO PLEAD
  13. OTION FILED FOR P1 MRI SOFTWARE LLC CLINTON E. PRESLAN 0080748 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AGREEMENT UNDER SEAL
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(56720723) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ELECTRA HOUSING AUTHORITY ATTN: KELLY BOWLIN 600 N MOORE ST #45 ELECTRA, TX 76360-0000 ANSWER DATE: 05/16/2025
  15. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. RIT FEE
  17. REVIEW OF THE DOCKET INDICATES THAT SERVICE WAS OBTAINED ON DEFENDANT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON 3/31/25. PLAINTIFF TO MONITOR ITS CASE FOR DEFAULT OF ANSWER AND FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN THE EVENT THAT NO ANSWER IS FILED. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE ITS CASE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS. PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THE FOLLOWING: (1) THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), ACCOUNT STATEMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES; (4) A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, IF APPLICABLE; AND (5) A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY. IN THE EVENT THAT DEFENDANT FILES A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE SET. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. RAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  19. URSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E), "IF A SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IS NOT MADE UPON A DEFENDANT WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT AND THE PARTY ON WHOSE BEHALF SUCH SERVICE WAS REQUIRED CANNOT SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SUCH SERVICE WAS NOT MADE WITHIN THAT PERIOD, THE ACTION SHALL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UPON THE COURT'S OWN INITIATIVE WITH NOTICE TO SUCH PARTY OR UPON MOTION." NOTICE ISSUED
  20. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56349009 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/31/2025 ELECTRA HOUSING AUTHORITY PROCESSED BY COC 04/09/2025.
  21. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56349010 RETURNED 3/31/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ELECTRA HOUSING AUTHORITY - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  22. UMS COMPLAINT(56349010) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ELECTRA HOUSING AUTHORITY ATTN: KELLY BOWLIN 600 N MOORE ST #45 ELECTRA, TX 76360-0000
  23. UMS COMPLAINT(56349009) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ELECTRA HOUSING AUTHORITY ATTN: MAX SCHLEGAL 600 N. MOORE ST #45 ELECTRA, TX 76360
  24. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  25. RIT FEE
  26. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. RIT FEE
  28. UDGE DAVID T MATIA ASSIGNED (RANDOM); COMMERCIAL DOCKET CASE, REASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN J RUSSO (RANDOM)
  29. UDGE DAVID T MATIA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  30. EGAL RESEARCH
  31. EGAL NEWS
  32. EGAL AID
  33. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  34. OMPUTER FEE
  35. LERK'S FEE
  36. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID PRESLAN LAW, LLC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more