Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-11
Status INACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket
Docket 25 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mri Software Llc
Defendant Pf Holdings, Llc
Photo of Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Judge

Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. EFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO PRESLAN LAW, LLC
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(57214291) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: PF HOLDINGS, LLC 10 HILL STREET NEWARK, NJ 07102
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(57214290) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CLINTON E. PRESLAN [email protected]
  4. ATE 06/09/2025 (NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRY AS OF & FOR 05/27/2025) THIS CASE CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION BEFORE THE COURT UPON THE COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF. DEFENDANT, PF HOLDINGS, LLC, BEING IN DEFAULT OF AN ANSWER, ALTHOUGH DULY SERVED ACCORDING TO LAW. THIS COURT FINDS THAT THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ARE WELL-TAKEN AND THAT PLAINTIFFIS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS PRAYED FOR IN THE COMPLAINT. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY RENDERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, MRI SOFTWARE LLC, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, PF HOLDINGS, LLC, IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,499.26 TOGETHER WITH ACCRUED INTEREST IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.00, FOR A TOTAL BALANCE OF $35,499.26, AND INTEREST THEREAFTER AT THE CONTRACT RATE OF 18.0% PER ANNUM ON THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT FROM MARCH 22, 2022, AND COSTS OF THIS ACTION. THIS CONSTITUTES A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(57091154) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: PF HOLDINGS, LLC 10 HILL STREET NEWARK, NJ 07102
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(57091153) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CLINTON E. PRESLAN [email protected]
  7. N AUGUST 28, 2023, PLAINTIFF FILED A COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS FOUR BROTHERS GROCERY LLC, DBA FOREST HILLS SUPERMARKET, THAKER MOHAMMED AND IBRAHIM ABDO OMAR. DEFENDANTS WERE DULY SERVED WITH PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND WERE REQUIRED TO ANSWER WITHIN 28 DAYS. TO DATE, DEFENDANTS HAVE FAILED TO FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING WITH THE COURT. PLAINTIFF FILED A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT, FOUR BROTHERS GROCERY LLC, DBA FOREST HILLS SUPERMARKET ONLY, IS GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $596518.74, PLUS INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, AND THE COSTS OF THIS ACTION. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. OTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT 1 TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL
  9. OTICE FILED BY P1 MRI SOFTWARE LLC ATTORNEY CLINTON E. PRESLAN 0080748 NOTICE OF FILING HEARING NOTICE
  10. EFAULT HEARING SET FOR 05/27/2025 AT 02:15 PM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT BY PHONE. ALL PARTIES SHALL CONTACT THE COURT AT 216-443-8589 AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE, TIME AND COURT PHONE NUMBER. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MUST FILE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS 5 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING: AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES AND MILITARY SERVICE, A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY, AND A COPY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE SENT BY PLAINTIFF NOTIFYING THE DEFENDANT OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE HEARING VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO BE SENT NO LATER THAN SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING.THE FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS 5 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING DATE MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST THEM. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. OTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AGREEMENT UNDER SEAL, FILED 04/24/2025, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  13. OTION FILED FOR P1 MRI SOFTWARE LLC CLINTON E. PRESLAN 0080748 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AGREEMENT UNDER SEAL
  14. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56357462 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/18/2025 PF HOLDINGS, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 03/26/2025.
  15. UMS COMPLAINT(56357462) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PF HOLDINGS, LLC 10 HILL STREET NEWARK, NJ 07102
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. RIT FEE
  18. UDGE PETER J CORRIGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  19. EGAL RESEARCH
  20. EGAL NEWS
  21. EGAL AID
  22. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  23. OMPUTER FEE
  24. LERK'S FEE
  25. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID PRESLAN LAW, LLC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more