Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-10
Status ACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 23 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Julius Warfield
Photo of Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Judge

Hon. Andrew J Santoli

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. HE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT SERVICE HAS NOT BEEN PERFECTED ON DEFENDANT. PLAINTIFF MUST PERFECT SERVICE BY 09/10/2025. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). NOTICE ISSUED
  2. UMS COMPLAINT(57712542) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JULIUS WARFIELD 46 GREENCROFT RD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  3. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  4. RIT FEE
  5. RAECIPE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  6. HIS COURT TAKES NOTICE OF CONFLICTING ENTRIES REGARDING SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JULIUS WARFIELD. SUMMONS OF THE COMPLAINT WAS SENT TO DEFENDANT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON OR ABOUT MARCH 11, 2025. ON OR ABOUT MARCH 30, 2025, THE CLERK JOURNALIZED AN ENTRY NOTING FAILURE OF SERVICE, AS THE CERTIFIED MAIL WENT "UNCLAIMED." (SEE 03/30/2025 ENTRY). PLAINTIFF THEN REQUESTED SERVICE VIA ORDINARY MAIL, WHICH WAS SENT OUT ON OR ABOUT APRIL 22, 2025. (SEE 04/22/2025 REQUEST AND 04/24/2025 ENTRY.) HOWEVER, THE CLERK JOURNALIZED A SECOND ENTRY, MARKING THE INITIAL CERTIFIED MAIL AS "INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS." (SEE 04/11/2025 ENTRY.) BASED ON THESE CONFLICTING ENTRIES, THIS COURT CANNOT FIND THAT SERVICE HAS BEEN PERFECTED UPON DEFENDANT. THIS COURT THUS ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO REISSUE THE COMPLAINT TO DEFENDANT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. UMS COMPLAINT(56764744) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JULIUS WARFIELD 46 GREENCROFT RD BEDFORD, OH 44146 ANSWER DATE: 05/21/2025
  8. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  9. RIT FEE
  10. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA REGULAR MAIL
  11. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56332493 RETURNED 03/29/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WARFIELD/JULIUS/ - INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56332493 RETURNED 3/29/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WARFIELD/JULIUS/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  13. UMS COMPLAINT(56332493) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JULIUS WARFIELD 46 GREENCROFT RD BEDFORD, OH 44146
  14. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  15. RIT FEE
  16. UDGE ANDREW J. SANTOLI ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  17. EGAL RESEARCH
  18. EGAL NEWS
  19. EGAL AID
  20. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  21. OMPUTER FEE
  22. LERK'S FEE
  23. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more