Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-26
Type Cc Adult Abuse Stalking
Docket 26 entries
Disposition tried by court-civil

Parties

Plaintiff Acting Pro Se
Defendant Walters, Thomas Michael
Photo of Hon. Kelsaw Nathan Thomas

Judge

Hon. Kelsaw Nathan Thomas

Crawford County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. rd of Protection Served Document ID - 25-AFOP-108; Served To - THOMAS MICHAEL WALTERS; Server - SO ST LOUIS COUNTY-CLAYTON; Served Date - 06/09/2025; Served Time - 12:58:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
  2. otice of Service 25-AFOP-108.
  3. udge/Clerk - Note Emailed service copies to St. Louis County Sheriff's Office.
  4. FULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  5. udmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 06/02/2026; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Additional Orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - NOT TO BE WITHIN 500 FEET OF PETITIONER; Resp not to abuse pet(s) - YES;
  6. rotection Order Issued Document ID: 25-AFOP-108, for WALTERS, THOMAS MICHAEL
  7. ound Recording Log Sheet
  8. ried by Court-Civil Cause called. Petitioner appears in person, pro se. Respondent appears in person, pro se. Hearing held. Evidence adduced. Allegations sufficient. Judgment for Full Order of Protection to issue, good for 1 year. Petitioner to pick up.
  9. dult Abuse Hearing Held Associated Entries: 05/13/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Associated Entries: 05/13/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled + Scheduled For: 06/03/2025; 9:00 AM; NATHAN THOMAS KELSAW; Dent Circuit Division
  10. udge/Clerk - Note Notice of Entry is mailed to Respondent at address on file.
  11. dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled SERVED 04/23/2025 Associated Entries: 06/03/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held Scheduled For: 06/03/2025; 9:00 AM; NATHAN THOMAS KELSAW; Dent Circuit Division
  12. earing Continued/Rescheduled Cause called. Petitioner appears in person, pro se. Respondent, although properly served, appears not. Cause passed to June 3, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. Associated Entries: 04/15/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Associated Entries: 04/15/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled + Associated Entries: 06/03/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held Hearing Continued From: 05/13/2025; 9:00 AM Adult Abuse Hearing
  13. otc of Hrng Returned Served Document ID - 25-AAHP-47; Served To - THOMAS MICHAEL WALTERS; Server - SO ST LOUIS COUNTY-CLAYTON; Served Date - 04/23/2025; Served Time - 16:15:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - SERV; Service Text -
  14. otice of Service 25-AAHP-47.
  15. udge/Clerk - Note Faxed service copies to St. Louis County Sheriff's Department.
  16. otice/Acknowledgement Issued Document ID: 25-AAHP-47, for WALTERS, THOMAS MICHAEL
  17. dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled for serviceEvent Text: for service/ SERVED 04/23/2025; Associated Entries: 05/13/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 05/13/2025; 9:00 AM; NATHAN THOMAS KELSAW; Dent Circuit Division
  18. earing Continued/Rescheduled Cause called. Petitioner appears in person, pro se. Respondent appears in person and acknowledged he had petition in his hand, even though NSERV states service refused. Respondent would not waive service. Cause passed to May 13, 2025 at 9:00 p.m. for hearing. Associated Entries: 03/26/2025 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled + Associated Entries: 05/13/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Hearing Continued From: 04/15/2025; 9:00 AM Adult Abuse Hearing
  19. efusal of Service Document ID - 25-AAHP-33; Served To - THOMAS MICHAEL WALTERS; Server - SO ST LOUIS COUNTY-CLAYTON; Served Date - 03/31/2025; Served Time - 09:45:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - NEST; Service Text -P.S. Defendant/Respondent refused Service of Paper, Left Copy
  20. otice of Service 25-AAHP-33.
  21. udge/Clerk - Note Faxed service copies to St. Louis County Sheriff's Department. Informed Petitioner of date & time of hearing.
  22. otice/Acknowledgement Issued Document ID: 25-AAHP-33, for WALTERS, THOMAS MICHAEL
  23. dult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Per Judge Kelsaw's instructions, Notice of Hearing to issue. Cause placed on the docket for April 15, 2025 at 9:00 a.m.Event Text: DFT Refused Service 03/31/2025; Associated Entries: 04/15/2025 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 04/15/2025; 9:00 AM; NATHAN THOMAS KELSAW; Dent Circuit Division
  24. onfidential Address Filed Filed By: Petitioner Acting Pro Se

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.