Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Minnesota Supreme Court

Court

Minnesota Supreme Court

Minnesota

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-11-19
Status Closed
Type Standard Civil Certiorari
Docket 79 entries

Docket Entries

  1. etition - Certiorari
  2. rder - PFR - Deny
  3. esponse - Petition for Review (A24-1822)
  4. esponse - Petition for Review (A24-1662)
  5. esponse - Petition for Review (A24-1821)
  6. esponse - Petition for Review (A24-1823)
  7. esponse - Petition for Review (A24-1824)
  8. otice - Attorney Withdrawal - Adam Szymanski obo Respondent
  9. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Response to PFR's Due 12/31/25
  10. otion - Extension of Time - Response to PFR
  11. etition - Further Review o/b/o Christopher Cushenbery (A24-1823)
  12. etition - Further Review o/b/o Andrew Bittell (A24-1822)
  13. etition - Further Review o/b/o Kristopher Dauble (A24-1821)
  14. etition - Further Review o/b/o Ronald Stenerson (A24-1824)
  15. pinion - Nonprecedential; motion granted
  16. otice - Opinion Release Imminent
  17. vent - Oral - Panel
  18. rder - Grant-Request for Additional Time for Oral Argument is Granted.
  19. orrespondence RE Apportionment of Time During Oral Arguments
  20. esponse - Motion-Respondent's Response to Appellant Motion for Additional Time
  21. otion - Oral Argument - Additional Time
  22. otice - Oral Argument Date Scheduled
  23. vent - Oral Panel - scheduled for 07/30/2025, 11:20 a.m., via ZoomGov
  24. orrespondence - Citation of Supplemental Authority
  25. otice - Oral Argument Date Scheduled
  26. vent - Oral Panel - scheduled for 07/30/2025, 11:15 a.m., #200 (has been rescheduled to 11:20 a.m. via Zoom)
  27. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Andrew Case obo Relator
  28. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Atty Humayun o/b/o Respondent (Amended)
  29. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Atty Humayun o/b/o Respondent (Amended)
  30. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Attorney Kelly for Relators
  31. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts Atty Humayun o/b/o Respondent
  32. rief - Respondent E-Filed
  33. rder - Deny Motion to File a Confidential and Redacted Brief. A Public Brief Shall be Filed by 5/5/25
  34. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Adam Szymanski for Respondent (Amended)
  35. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Andrew Case obo Relator
  36. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts Atty Humayun o/b/o Respondent City of Minneapolis
  37. otion - Seal - Respondent Brief
  38. rder - Deny-Respondent's motion to accept two versions of respondent's principal brief is denied. Brief Due 4/15/25.
  39. eply - Other-Relator Matthew Severance's Reply Brief
  40. rief - Reply E-Filed ( Consolidated Reply Brief for Relators Bittell, Cushenberry, Dauble, and Stenerson )
  41. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Andrew Case for Relator
  42. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Attorney Joseph Kelly for Relators Bittell, Cushenbery, Dauble and Stenerson
  43. orrespondence - Incoming-Respondent Regarding Redacted Brief (Amended Redacted in Draft)
  44. vent - Itemized List of Record Received - Second Amended
  45. otion - Seal-Respondent-City of Minneapolis Request to File Public and Sealed Versions of Draft. (Briefs in Draft)
  46. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Munazza Humayun obo Respondent (City of Minneapolis)
  47. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Adam Szymanski obo Respondent (City of Minneapolis)
  48. vent - Itemized List of Record Received - AMENDED + Exhibits
  49. vent - Itemized List of Record Received - AMENDED
  50. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Respondent Brief Due 3/21/25 and May be up to 16,500 Words
  51. rder - Other-Severance's motion to supplement the record is deferred to the panel that will be assigned to decide these appeals on the merits. See Order for Details.
  52. esponse - Motion - Respondent Brief - Enlarged
  53. esponse - Motion - Extension of Time - Respondent Brief
  54. rder - Deny-The motion to transmit portions of the record under seal is denied as unnecessary. See Order for Details.
  55. otion - Respondent Brief - Enlarged
  56. otion - Extension of Time - Respondent Brief
  57. esponse - Motion - Seal
  58. esponse - Motion - Seal
  59. vent - Electronic Record Submitted/Received - MACS + CTRACK
  60. otion - Seal Portions of Record
  61. ejected - Motion to Seal
  62. ffidavit - Service - Appellant's Brief (Severance)
  63. ejected- Appellant Briefs - Duplicative
  64. otice - Request Trial Court/Agency File
  65. rief - Appellant E-Filed (Severance)
  66. rief - Appellant E-Filed (Dauble, Bittell, Cushenbery, Stenerson)
  67. eply - In Support of Motion to Supplement the Record
  68. esponse - Motion - Supplement the Record
  69. ffidavit - Service of Motion - Supplement the Record
  70. otion - Supplement the Record
  71. vent - Itemized List of Record Received
  72. rder - Briefing/Scheduling
  73. esponse - Motion to Consolidate
  74. rder - Consolidating Cases - The City Shall Serve an Itemized List by 12/30/24
  75. otice - Attorney Appearance - Munazza Humayun and Adam Szymanski obo Respondent
  76. ffidavit - Service of writ of cert
  77. otice - Case Filing
  78. rit - Certiorari
  79. tatement - Case - Relator

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more