Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-05
Type Protective Order
Docket 22 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Pruett, Evelyn Diane,
Defendant Weber, Lauren Madison,
Photo of Hon. Gass Charles

Judge

Hon. Gass Charles

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. PROTECTIVE ORDER INITIAL FILING.//PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER//FILED
  2. PROTECTIVE ORDER
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. ACKNOWLEDGMENT//FILED
  19. ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF CANADIAN COUNTY FOR SERVICE ON LAUREN MADISON WEBER HAND DELIVERED TO CCSO
  20. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE GASS, CHARLES TO THIS CASE.
  21. CANADIAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S RETURN ON ORIGINAL ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORER//FILED ***LAUREN WEBER PERSONALLY SERVED 08/05/25**
  22. CRT MIN. MATTER COMES ON FOR PO HEARING. APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT ARE PLAINTIFF IN PERSON PRO SE AND DEFENDANT IN PERSON PRO SE. ZACHARY STRONG, DEFENDANT'S FIANCÉ, WHO IS PLAINTIFF'S EX-HUSBAND AND THE FATHER OF PLAINTIFF'S CHILDREN, SITS IN THE AUDIENCE. THE PROCEEDING IS RECORDED ON A ZOOM DEVICE AND THE FILES ARE SAVED AS: ZOOM.0024.MP3 AND ZOOM.0025.MP3 . BOTH PARTIES ANNOUNCE READINESS FOR HEARING. PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT, AND DEFENDANT'S FIANCÉ OFFER SWORN TESTIMONY AND THE PARTIES PROVIDE ARGUMENT. DEFENDANT PRESENTS 8 EXHIBITS AND THE COURT ADMITS 7. THE COURT FINDS THE PARTIES HAVE A FAMILY/HOUSEHOLD RELATIONSHIP BECAUSE THEY SHARE PARENTING OF THE SAME CHILDREN. THE COURT FINDS DEFENDANT ENGAGED IN A KNOWING AND WILLFUL COURSE OF CONDUCT DIRECTED AT PLAINTIFF WHICH SERIOUSLY ALARMS OR ANNOYS THE PERSON AND SERVES NO LEGITIMATE PURPOSE. THE COURSE OF CONDUCT WOULD CAUSE A REASONABLE PERSON AND DID CAUSE PLAINTIFF SUBSTANTIAL EMOTION DISTRESS. THE COURT ISSUES AN ORDER OF PROTECTION EFFECTIVE UNTIL AUGUST 1, 2028. PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT HAVE CHILDREN CURRENTLY ATTENDING THE SAME SCHOOL. DEFENDANT ASKS THE COURT WHETHER SHE WILL BE IN VIOLATION OF THE ORDER IF SHE ATTENDS SCHOOL EVENTS WHERE PLAINTIFF IS PRESENT. THE COURT INFORMS DEFENDANT THAT SHE IS PROHIBITED FROM HARASSING PLAINTIFF - SHE MUST IGNORE PLAINTIFF WHEN AT SCHOOL FUNCTIONS. DEFENDANT ANNOUNCES HER INTENTION TO APPEAL THIS COURT'S DECISION. DEFENDANT IS PROVIDED A COPY OF THE COURT'S ORDER. THE COURT RETAINS THE ADMITTED EXHIBITS (1,2,4,5,6,7,8). JUDGE DEWEY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more