Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Minnesota Supreme Court

Court

Minnesota Supreme Court

Minnesota

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-30
Status Briefing
Type Standard Civil Implied Consent
Docket 21 entries

Docket Entries

  1. otice - Appeal - Case Filed; Order 6/9/25
  2. otice - Request Trial Court/Agency File
  3. rief - Appellant E-Filed
  4. rder - Grant-Appellant's 2nd Request for Extension of Time to File Brief is Granted, Due 12/5/25.
  5. otion - Extension of Time - Appellant's Brief
  6. ejected Appellant Brief-Late, Motion Needed
  7. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Appellant's Brief Due 11/18/25
  8. orrecting Deficiencies Rejected - Unclear What Filer is Attempting to File
  9. otion - Extension of Time - Appellant's Brief
  10. rder - Remedy Deficiencies-Appellant Brief Due 11/10/25. See Order for Details
  11. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Michelle Pecharich
  12. ranscript - Initial Certificate Michelle Pecharich
  13. otice - Attorney Appearance Atty Moen o/b/o Respondent
  14. ther - Correcting Deficiencies - Affidavit of Service - Appeal Documents on Respondent
  15. indings - In Forma Pauperis - Trial Court - Grant
  16. ejected proof of service - documents improperly identified - no name or address of service recipient.
  17. ejected filing from Appellant - Documents attached were the notice of case filing, notice of filing of order, and proof of filing of the notice of case filing - All unnecessary.
  18. ther - Correcting Deficiencies - Proof of Filing
  19. ffidavit of Service Rejected - Incorrect File Number x2
  20. otice - Case Filing
  21. tatement - Case - Appellant

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more