Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-10
Status ACTIVE
Type Civil Appl To Dca/supreme
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sant Angelo, Daniel Lawrence | Santangelo, Carla Marie
Defendant Sant Angelo Hughes, Jennifer
Photo of Hon. Estrada Peter

Judge

Hon. Estrada Peter

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: IT IS ORDERED THAT JENNIFER SANT ANGELO HUGHES AND CHRISTOPHER SANT ANGELO'S SECOND REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A SUBSTANTIVE RESPONSE TO CARLA SANT ANGELO'S MOTION TO ENFORCE THE MANDATE IS GRANTED.
  2. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: IT IS ORDERED THAT JENNIFER AND CHRISTOPHER SANT ANGELO REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A SUBSTANTIVE RESPONSE TO CARLA SANT ANGELO'S MOTION TO ENFORCE THE MANDATE IS GRANTED. THEY SHALL FILE THEIR RESPONSE ON OR BEFORE JULY 18, 2025.
  3. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: NOT APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION.
  4. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 8/31/2025 updated with compliance action of
  5. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 8/31/2025 updated with compliance action of
  6. DescriptionCompliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE updated due date to 8/31/2025
  7. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 8/21/2025 updated with compliance action of
  8. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 8/21/2025 updated with compliance action of
  9. DescriptionCompliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX updated due date to 8/21/2025
  10. CIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 8/10/2025 updated with compliance action of
  11. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 7/31/2025 updated with compliance action of
  12. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 10 DAYS
  13. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: NOTICE OF CASE UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR MEDIATION
  14. CIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 8/10/2025 updated with compliance action of
  15. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 7/31/2025 updated with compliance action of
  16. DIRECTIONS TO THE CLERK
  17. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THIS CASE APPEARS TO SEEK REVIEW OF A FINAL ORDER IN A PROBATE OR GUARDIANSHIP CASE. APPELLANT MAY ELECT TO PROCEED ON APPENDICES RATHER THAN A RECORD
  18. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: RECORD OF APPEAL DUE WITHIN 60 DAYS OF FILING NOA
  19. SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: FILING FEE DUE
  20. ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM DISTRICT COURT
  21. Agency Case Number modified: 6D 25-1398
  22. Judge: ESTRADA , PETER FRANK Assigned
  23. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
  24. State Attorney Case Number modified: PC21-515
  25. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  26. Compliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE has been created with due date of 8/10/2025
  27. Compliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX has been created with due date of 7/31/2025
  28. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more