Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-17
Status ACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rovisys Company
Defendant Bausch Advanced Technologies, Inc.
Photo of Hon. JOAN SYNENBERG

Judge

Hon. JOAN SYNENBERG

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MC BY PHONE SET FOR 08/01/2025 AT 09:30 AM. (Notice Sent).
  2. NSWER FILED BY D1 BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ATTORNEY MARK W BIGGERMAN 0064092 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  3. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED D1 BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. MARK W BIGGERMAN 0064092. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF MARK BIGGERMAN ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT
  4. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 06/09/2025, IS HELD IN ABEYANCE. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 06/27/2025. PLAINTIFF APPEARS THROUGH COUNSEL. CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVES APPEAR ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. THE COURT GRANTS DEFENDANT LEAVE UNTIL NO LATER THAN 07/28/2025 TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING FOR THIS MATTER WHICH CONFORMS WITH THE CIVIL RULES. DEFAULT HEARING IS RESET AS FOLLOWS: TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 07/31/2025 AT 10:30 AM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES TO CALL INTO THE FOLLOWING CONFERENCE LINE AT THE SCHEDULED TIME: DIAL-IN: (720)-527-5947 ACCESS CODE: 5692720# DEFAULT JUDGMENT WILL BE ENTERED AT THE NEXT HEARING IF A RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS NOT TIMELY FILED. DEFAULT HEARING WILL BE CONVERTED TO A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IF A RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS TIMELY FILED. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. OTICE FILED BY P1 ROVISYS COMPANY ATTORNEY JENNA R. BIRD 0101434 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE OF JOURNAL ENTRY DATED JUNE 9, 2025
  6. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED P1 ROVISYS COMPANY NICHOLAS M. VENTO 0093599. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  7. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  8. HE COURT IS IN RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 06/09/2025. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT SERVICE HAS BEEN PERFECTED, BUT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL RULES. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 06/27/2025 AT 10:30 AM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES TO CALL INTO THE FOLLOWING CONFERENCE LINE AT THE SCHEDULED TIME: DIAL-IN: (720)-527-5947 ACCESS CODE: 5692720# COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE, TIME AND CONFERENCE CALL DIRECTIONS. BEFORE HEARING DATE, PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, AN AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY STATUS (NOT APPLICABLE TO CORPORATE DEFENDANTS), A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY, AND A COPY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DEFENDANT ADVISING OF THE DATE, TIME, AND LOCATION OF THE HEARING. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE MADE VIA REGULAR MAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL, TO BE SENT NO LATER THAN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS ON OR BEFORE THE HEARING DATE MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN A DEFAULT JUDGMENT. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). NOTICE ISSUED
  9. HE DOCKET REFLECTS GOOD SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AND THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO TIMELY FILE AN ANSWER. PLAINTIFF IS TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHIN 60 DAYS OF JOURNALIZATION OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). NOTICE ISSUED
  10. SPS RECEIPT NO. 56747755 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/28/2025 BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PROCESSED BY COC 05/07/2025.
  11. UMS COMPLAINT(56747755) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. C/O STATUTORY AGENT 251 LITTLE FALLS DRIVE WILMINGTON, DE 19808-0000
  12. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  13. RIT FEE
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(56735409) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 115 NOD RD. CLINTON, CT 06413 ANSWER DATE: 05/19/2025
  15. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. RIT FEE
  17. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  18. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  19. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 56395789 RETURNED 4/15/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. UMS COMPLAINT(56395789) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BAUSCH ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 115 NOD RD. CLINTON, CT 06413
  21. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. RIT FEE
  23. UDGE JOAN SYNENBERG ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  24. EGAL RESEARCH
  25. EGAL NEWS
  26. EGAL AID
  27. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  28. OMPUTER FEE
  29. LERK'S FEE
  30. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JENNA R. BIRD

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more